On Saturday 10 February 2007 23:31, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm afraid I disagree with a few of the points you raise.
>
I think both views have points and none of them is wrong. I accept as it is
but I would prefer having it disabled by default. But perhaps this is valid
only for m
Hello,
I'm afraid I disagree with a few of the points you raise.
JoaoBR wrote:
even if ipv6 is a real situation it is not the standard, ipv4 is, then, even
if ipv6 is some network's standard it is not a global standard, ipv4 is
certainly then, it makes no sense that ipv6 is the default, nei
On Saturday 10 February 2007 17:08, Spil Oss wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Well, actually I'm proposing a change to the GENERIC kernel and
> make.conf.example to add to the comment that one should add
> WITHOUT_IPV6 to the make.conf if you enable NO_INET6.
>
> That sounds to me like something completely
Hi Michael,
Well, actually I'm proposing a change to the GENERIC kernel and
make.conf.example to add to the comment that one should add
WITHOUT_IPV6 to the make.conf if you enable NO_INET6.
That sounds to me like something completely different than contacting
all port-maintainers.
There may off
Spil Oss wrote:
Hi All,
I have NO_INET6 in my /etc/make.conf and INET6 is commented out in my
kernel config.
Until today I did *not* have WITHOUT_IPV6 in my make.conf
In 6.1 I have been unable to run php 5.2 in combination with
mail/roundcube, it segfaulted apache, 5.1.6_3 was fine.
Since my upg
