Re: PR backlog [was: Re: usb/umass, devfs: this sucks]

2007-12-31 Thread Tilman Linneweh
It's sent out weekly. So only people which are on bugbusters@ receive it. If someone is interested in this but is not interested in the other bugbusters@ mails, they will not see it. Actually apart from this thread that weekly email is the only traffic on bugbusters@ _

Re: PR backlog [was: Re: usb/umass, devfs: this sucks]

2007-12-30 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Sat, 29 Dec 2007 22:26:02 -0600): On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 01:01:19AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 26 Dec 2007 12:04:15 -0600): > - The creation of a weekly posting "bugs the bugmeister tea

Re: PR backlog [was: Re: usb/umass, devfs: this sucks]

2007-12-29 Thread Mark Linimon
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 01:01:19AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 26 Dec 2007 > 12:04:15 -0600): > > > - The creation of a weekly posting "bugs the bugmeister team thinks are > > ready for commit". This doesn't seem to have attracted th

Re: PR backlog [was: Re: usb/umass, devfs: this sucks]

2007-12-29 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 26 Dec 2007 12:04:15 -0600): - The creation of a weekly posting "bugs the bugmeister team thinks are ready for commit". This doesn't seem to have attracted the desired attention. Perhaps this is a problem of "push" not being the righ