> From: Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 12:39:21 -0500
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ÞÅÔ×ÅÒ 27 ÇÒÕÄÅÎØ 2007 12:33 ÐÏ, M. Warner Losh ÷É ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌÉ:
> > I did the bulk of the work for the 7.0 stuff, at least getting things
> > into the tree. Since I did the work, my la
It's sent out weekly.
So only people which are on bugbusters@ receive it. If someone is
interested in this but is not interested in the other bugbusters@
mails, they will not see it.
Actually apart from this thread that weekly email is the only traffic
on bugbusters@
_
Quoting Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Sat, 29 Dec 2007
22:26:02 -0600):
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 01:01:19AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 26 Dec 2007
12:04:15 -0600):
> - The creation of a weekly posting "bugs the bugmeister tea
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 01:01:19AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 26 Dec 2007
> 12:04:15 -0600):
>
> > - The creation of a weekly posting "bugs the bugmeister team thinks are
> > ready for commit". This doesn't seem to have attracted th
Quoting Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 26 Dec 2007
12:04:15 -0600):
- The creation of a weekly posting "bugs the bugmeister team thinks are
ready for commit". This doesn't seem to have attracted the desired
attention. Perhaps this is a problem of "push" not being the righ
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 09:43:08 +0100 (CET)
"Remko Lodder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Warner et all,
>
> On Wed, December 26, 2007 7:42 pm, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > Mark and Henrik make a number of good points here. Rather than reply
> > to the details, I'm going to make a couple of qui
четвер 27 грудень 2007 12:33 по, M. Warner Losh Ви написали:
> I did the bulk of the work for the 7.0 stuff, at least getting things
> into the tree. Since I did the work, my last job got totally insane
> and then I switched jobs.
As the old Russian saying went: if vodka interferes with your job,
четвер 27 грудень 2007 10:52 до, M. Warner Losh Ви написали:
> Usually that's called a maintainer, but we haven't had a real one in a
> long time. Or even a fake one.
Well, you responded to me earlier suggesting, I take it upon myself to merge
USB-advancements from 7.x to 6.x. That implied, some
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: четвер 27 грудень 2007 10:52 до, M. Warner Losh Ви написали:
: > Usually that's called a maintainer, but we haven't had a real one in a
: > long time. Or even a fake one.
:
: Well, you responded to me earlie
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On середа 26 грудень 2007, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: = As a project we're not leveraging the community sufficiently when it
: = comes to contributions. �The current system of patch review and
: = submission is v
On середа 26 грудень 2007, M. Warner Losh wrote:
= As a project we're not leveraging the community sufficiently when it
= comes to contributions. The current system of patch review and
= submission is very hap-hazard. If you happen to get the attention of
= the right person at the right time, the
Hello Warner et all,
On Wed, December 26, 2007 7:42 pm, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> Mark and Henrik make a number of good points here. Rather than reply
> to the details, I'm going to make a couple of quick observations.
>
> As a project we're not leveraging the community sufficiently when it
> come
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 12:43:06PM -0800, Richard Neese wrote:
> Point and Fax I have emaile Sobomax about fixing and updating the asterisk
> ports. and have sent patches but never got a reply in 9 months.
For situations like this you need to email [EMAIL PROTECTED] We already have
defined para
I agree with this and there is also the 2nd issue of commiters not responding
to those working on updating ports.
Point and Fax I have emaile Sobomax about fixing and updating the asterisk
ports. and have sent patches but never got a reply in 9 months.
If your going to be a maintainer you nee
Mark and Henrik make a number of good points here. Rather than reply
to the details, I'm going to make a couple of quick observations.
As a project we're not leveraging the community sufficiently when it
comes to contributions. The current system of patch review and
submission is very hap-hazard
15 matches
Mail list logo
