Scott Lambert wrote:
> Some of us are just using a jail per service to make the service more
> portable between these massively overpowered machines these days.
Yes, that makes total sense. I'm not saying that running it in a jail
is a _bad_ thing, just that perhaps it is overkill.
Doug
--
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 11:27:55AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Wednesday 02 September 2009 12:09:17 pm Doug Barton wrote:
> >> FLEURIOT Damien wrote:
> >>
> >>> BIND's now happily running in its jail and responding to public
> >>> queries.
> >>
> >> It's up to you if you
John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 September 2009 12:09:17 pm Doug Barton wrote:
>> FLEURIOT Damien wrote:
>>
>>> BIND's now happily running in its jail and responding to public
>>> queries.
>> It's up to you if you choose to do it, but there is no reason to run
>> BIND in a jail. The chroot fea
On Wednesday 02 September 2009 12:09:17 pm Doug Barton wrote:
> FLEURIOT Damien wrote:
>
> > BIND's now happily running in its jail and responding to public
> > queries.
>
> It's up to you if you choose to do it, but there is no reason to run
> BIND in a jail. The chroot feature provided by defau
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message <20090902160440.ga28...@sd-13813.dedibox.fr>, FLEURIOT Damien
> writes
> :
>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 08:15:24PM + or thereabouts, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote
>> :
>> > On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Major Domo wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > >Ap
In message <20090902160440.ga28...@sd-13813.dedibox.fr>, FLEURIOT Damien writes
:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 08:15:24PM + or thereabouts, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote
> :
> > On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Major Domo wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > >Apologies if this has been discussed already but I searched the web
FLEURIOT Damien wrote:
> BIND's now happily running in its jail and responding to public
> queries.
It's up to you if you choose to do it, but there is no reason to run
BIND in a jail. The chroot feature provided by default by rc.d/named
is quite adequate security.
Doug
--
This .signatur
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 08:15:24PM + or thereabouts, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Major Domo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >Apologies if this has been discussed already but I searched the web
> >and the mailing lists and haven't found hints on my problem.
> >
> >I've got a jail, I assign
John Hay wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 11:29:40PM +0200, FLEURIOT Damien wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 10:13:45PM +0200 or thereabouts, John Hay wrote:
>>> I have not used jails with link-local addresses, only global addresses
>>> and that works. It looks like you did not specify the whole l
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 11:29:40PM +0200, FLEURIOT Damien wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 10:13:45PM +0200 or thereabouts, John Hay wrote:
> >
> > I have not used jails with link-local addresses, only global addresses
> > and that works. It looks like you did not specify the whole link-local
> >
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 10:13:45PM +0200 or thereabouts, John Hay wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 09:30:15PM +0200, Major Domo wrote:
> > Hello list,
> >
> >
> > Apologies if this has been discussed already but I searched the web
> > and the mailing lists and haven't found hints on my problem.
>
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Major Domo wrote:
Hi,
Apologies if this has been discussed already but I searched the web
and the mailing lists and haven't found hints on my problem.
I've got a jail, I assign it a set of IP addresses, and it just won't
take the IP6 I give it.
Uname:
FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 09:30:15PM +0200, Major Domo wrote:
> Hello list,
>
>
> Apologies if this has been discussed already but I searched the web
> and the mailing lists and haven't found hints on my problem.
>
> I've got a jail, I assign it a set of IP addresses, and it just won't
> take the
13 matches
Mail list logo
