Hi Dan,
Am Dienstag, den 12.04.2011, 17:42 -0500 schrieb Dan Nelson:
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/hardware/module/guide/03instal.html#wpxref23495
you saved our week :-) That was it. My Cisco administrator take a closer
look and found out, that both NICs was connecte
In the last episode (Apr 12), Dan Nelson said:
> In the last episode (Apr 12), Denny Schierz said:
> > Am Montag, den 11.04.2011, 21:52 +0200 schrieb Denny Schierz:
> > > Am 11.04.2011 um 20:06 schrieb Tim Daneliuk:
> > > > Are you certain you are not somehow running active-passive instead of
> > >
On 11 April 2011 22:00, Denny Schierz wrote:
> hi,
>
> after testing severals loadbalancing (LACP) types with Cisco, we saw,
> that we never get more than 112MB/s with two network cards and iperf.
>
> So, we tested without loadbalancing, 4 Clients (iperf -f M -c ) and
> two target IPs. Every IP ha
On Mon, 11.04.2011 at 12:00:39 +0200, Denny Schierz wrote:
> hi,
>
> after testing severals loadbalancing (LACP) types with Cisco, we saw,
> that we never get more than 112MB/s with two network cards and iperf.
>
> So, we tested without loadbalancing, 4 Clients (iperf -f M -c ) and
> two target
In the last episode (Apr 12), Denny Schierz said:
> Am Montag, den 11.04.2011, 21:52 +0200 schrieb Denny Schierz:
> > Am 11.04.2011 um 20:06 schrieb Tim Daneliuk:
> > > Are you certain you are not somehow running active-passive instead of
> > > active-active ... just a thought...
> >
> > 150% sur
hi,
Am Montag, den 11.04.2011, 21:52 +0200 schrieb Denny Schierz:
> hi,
>
> Am 11.04.2011 um 20:06 schrieb Tim Daneliuk:
>
> > Are you certain you are not somehow running active-passive instead of
> > active-active ...
> > just a thought...
>
> 150% sure. I used two dedicated NICs WITHOUT any
hi,
Am 11.04.2011 um 20:06 schrieb Tim Daneliuk:
> Are you certain you are not somehow running active-passive instead of
> active-active ...
> just a thought...
150% sure. I used two dedicated NICs WITHOUT any loadbalancing. The sum has to
be more than 112MB/s.
cu denny
ps. I get every answ
On 4/11/2011 12:55 PM, Denny Schierz said this:
>
> Am 11.04.2011 um 16:20 schrieb Michael Loftis:
>
>> Most switches load balance based on MAC addresses, not IP, unless it
>> is routing the traffic as a Layer 3 switch then you can enable IP
>> based load balancing in some of those. Also you mig
Am 11.04.2011 um 16:20 schrieb Michael Loftis:
> Most switches load balance based on MAC addresses, not IP, unless it
> is routing the traffic as a Layer 3 switch then you can enable IP
> based load balancing in some of those. Also you might simply be
that was the reason, why we disabled the lo
