> > >From this it sounds as it is a problem that should
be
> > fixed, but it
> > obviously isnt in 4.8. Is this behaviour now
considered
> > acceptable? And if
> > so, doesnt this make FreeBSD extremely easy to kill
> > using a simple
> > DOS-attack? Is this "fixed" in any way on 5.1?
>
> Yup, that
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:03:20AM +0200, John
B?ckstrand wrote:
> > Ive been googling quite a bit now for problems with
> > running out of mbuf
> > clusters. Im basically sending a 30k datachunk down
> > 1000-4000 connections,
> > but 1000 is more than enough to quickly fill upp
8192
> > mbuf cl
John Bdckstrand wrote:
>
> Ive been googling quite a bit now for problems with
> running out of mbuf
> clusters. Im basically sending a 30k datachunk down
> 1000-4000 connections,
> but 1000 is more than enough to quickly fill upp 8192
> mbuf clusters. I also
> tried setting maximum amount of mbuf
