On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 09:38:30PM +, Bruce Simpson wrote:
> Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
>> Is it possible to have traceroute MFC'd for 7.1? I would like to have -a
>> and -A switchs (ASN Path mapping) available. Thank you :)
>>
>
> There's an AS lookup capable traceroute in ports:
>/usr/p
Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
Is it possible to have traceroute MFC'd for 7.1? I would like to have
-a and -A switchs (ASN Path mapping) available. Thank you :)
There's an AS lookup capable traceroute in ports:
/usr/ports/net/ntraceroute
is this insufficient for your needs?
thanks
BMS
__
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 13:06 -0200, Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
> Is it possible to have traceroute MFC'd for 7.1? I would like to have -a
I second that request. I'm prepared to bribe someone as well.
~BAS
> and -A switchs (ASN Path mapping) available. Thank you :)
>
--
Brian A. Seklecki <[EMAI
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Joao Barros wrote:
There are two FC switches, but AFAIK a multipath setup would have, for
example one disk coming from isp0 and the other from isp1, as isp0 and
isp1 are connected to two switches...
It's entirely possible that something's ill defined in the FC management
The GEOM multipath code hasn't been MFC'd yet.
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Ivan Voras wrote:
Joao Barros wrote:
On 3/9/07, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not familiar with this hardware, but I'm curious why I see the one
test drive I assigned to it twice. I seem to recall reading somewhe
On 3/9/07, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joao Barros wrote:
> On 3/9/07, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm not familiar with this hardware, but I'm curious why I see the one
>> test drive I assigned to it twice. I seem to recall reading somewhere a
>> discussion for Linux in wh
On 3/9/07, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not familiar with this hardware, but I'm curious why I see the one
test drive I assigned to it twice. I seem to recall reading somewhere a
discussion for Linux in which it's been mentioned that one of these
should be a read-write and another "r
Joao Barros wrote:
> On 3/9/07, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm not familiar with this hardware, but I'm curious why I see the one
>> test drive I assigned to it twice. I seem to recall reading somewhere a
>> discussion for Linux in which it's been mentioned that one of these
>> should
Ivan Voras ha scritto:
I'm interested in having support for QLogic 24xx cards in 6-stable
It was backported 34 hours ago ;-)
My card identifies itself as 2462s, in an IBM blade.
Nobody tested the new code with a 246x card, but probably is the same as
242x (tested).
--
Alex Dupre
Alex Dupre wrote:
> Ivan Voras ha scritto:
>> I'm interested in having support for QLogic 24xx cards in 6-stable
>
> It was backported 34 hours ago ;-)
That was fast :)
I've cvsupped before trying to get the blade to work (needed SerDes
support for bce cards) but wow, it has been almost three da
On 5/20/05, Scot Hetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Additionally these changes would allow VMware 4 to function. Could we
> get a MFC of the 6-CURRENT linux emulator code to 5-STABLE, or at a
> minimum the following versions:
>
Also need to bump the OSVERSION on 5-STABLE when commited, so the
V
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cyrille Lefevre writes:
: Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes:
: > : From today's -CURRENT dmesg:
: > :
: > : ---===> Happy Birthday Peter!!! <===---
: > :
: > : Can this please be MFCed fo
Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes:
> : From today's -CURRENT dmesg:
> :
> : ---===> Happy Birthday Peter!!! <===---
> :
> : Can this please be MFCed for 4.3-RELEASE?
>
> Once it has been in FreeBSD -current for about a we
13 matches
Mail list logo
