Re: HEADSUP: bridge(4) removed from HEAD

2005-09-28 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Wed, 2005-Sep-28 08:13:32 +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: >Considering that we only (more or less) document -STABLE branches in >the Handbook it's not a big rush, as long as it's mentioned before 7.0 >comes out, though documentation about if_bridge in the Handbook would >of cause be nice, conside

Re: HEADSUP: bridge(4) removed from HEAD

2005-09-27 Thread Simon L. Nielsen
On 2005.09.27 20:26:37 -0700, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Max Laier wrote: > >All, > > > >as discussed on -arch, the old bridge(4) implementation has been removed > >from HEAD. The new if_bridge(4) is there to serve as a full functional > >replacement. If you find anything that does not work with if

Re: HEADSUP: bridge(4) removed from HEAD

2005-09-27 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Max Laier wrote: All, as discussed on -arch, the old bridge(4) implementation has been removed from HEAD. The new if_bridge(4) is there to serve as a full functional replacement. If you find anything that does not work with if_bridge(4) that used to work with bridge(4), please let me or And