Shawn Barnhart wrote:
> I guess it's not a question of finding glaring errors that seemed worthy of
> send-pr, but things I found misleading, confusing or outdated by "newer and
> better" procedures like make buildkernel.
I got my commit bit by sending PRs which were as simple as typos
sometimes
- Original Message -
From: "Nik Clayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| # cd /usr/gnats/docs
| # grep -i barnhart *
| #
|
| S'funny, this seems to be the first time you've told any of us. Next
| time, please use send-pr(1) with the category set to "docs". It would be
| appreciated if
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 01:33:58PM -0500, Shawn Barnhart wrote:
> I guess I don't care which tools I use, so long as they do the right
> thing, and, most importantly THAT THE METHODS ARE TOTALLY DOCUMENTED
> WITH ALL THE QUIRKS IN THE FSCK'N HANDBOOK AND NOT JUST IN THE MAILING
> LIST ARCHIVE!
>
In message <00b801bfeb66$94ab2960$9b239fc0@mobocracy> "Shawn Barnhart" writes:
: I guess I don't care which tools I use, so long as they do the right
: thing, and, most importantly THAT THE METHODS ARE TOTALLY DOCUMENTED
: WITH ALL THE QUIRKS IN THE FSCK'N HANDBOOK AND NOT JUST IN THE MAILING
: LI
> 1. The other 1199 new FreeBSD CD-ROM customers you need to get, are they more
>likely to be CVSUPping, mailing-list tracking, make-worlding-since-2.0.1
The people who buy the CDs tend to be more "expert" in nature, it's
the newcomers who generally FTP install the system.
>experience?
"Jordan K. Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Once you add up his full benefit package (medical, dental, 401K,
>insurance, etc) and salary, it still takes another 1199 of you to pay
>for the rest of him just through buying CDs at full price, three times
>a year.
[...]
>To summarize, it counts,
> "KK" == Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
KK> support after the fact, and so people should be using the buildkernel
KK> target if they want their kernel builds to work across upgrades.
Which is a very different claim than saying you should *always* use
buildkernel, and no other met
On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>Well, I didn't see you very active with the 20-odd people who posted the
>same build error this time around. And I think it makes much more sense to
>teach people to use a tool which won't have dependency problems in the
>first place than to catch them a
On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Doug Barton wrote:
> There is also the option of naming your kernel config file "kernel".
>
Yes, but some people don't like to name their children "kernel" for
whatever reason.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in t
> "KK" == Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
KK> On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Vivek Khera wrote:
>> So you're saying that even after upgrading from 3.4 to 4.0 you should
>> use make buildkernel? That seems counter to what has been discussed
>> before, and is way non-BSD-ish.
KK> Buildkernel
10 matches
Mail list logo
