Re: Gateway [SOLVED]

2006-08-21 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Aug 19, 2006, at 10:58 PM, SigmaX asdf wrote: Found my problem. T[h]e firewall_type option is case sensitive -- and "OPEN" is supposed to be lowercase. The firewall_type option isn't case-sensitive, and hasn't been since early 4.x; see /etc/rc.firewall: case ${firewall_type} in [Oo][P

Re: Gateway [SOLVED]

2006-08-20 Thread Doug Barton
SigmaX asdf wrote: > For the archives: > > Found my problem. Te firewall_type option is case sensitive -- and "OPEN" > is supposed to be lowercase. I would find that very surprising, given that as far as I can see, everywhere that the firewall_type variable is parsed it's tested against [Oo][Pp]

Re: Gateway [SOLVED]

2006-08-19 Thread SigmaX asdf
For the archives: Found my problem. Te firewall_type option is case sensitive -- and "OPEN" is supposed to be lowercase. Cheerio, SigmaX On 7/28/06, SigmaX asdf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm trying to setup a gateway/firewall on my network in a similar setup to that shown in the in the ha

RE: Gateway

2006-07-31 Thread Iasen Kostov
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 10:01 +0100, Rodrigo Galiano wrote: > Hi, > >Just add the following lines on rc.conf to get your gateway up and > running for the LAN: > > gateway_enable="YES" > natd_enable="YES" > natd_flags="-n xxx" (you should replace xxx with your external interface > name) from /e

RE: Gateway

2006-07-31 Thread Rodrigo Galiano
TECTED] On Behalf Of SigmaX asdf Sent: segunda-feira, 31 de Julho de 2006 8:39 To: Igor Robul Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gateway I take it firewall_type="OPEN" does not include the divert rule? The handbooks reads "The kernel source needs 'option divert' st

Re: Gateway

2006-07-31 Thread SigmaX asdf
I take it firewall_type="OPEN" does not include the divert rule? The handbooks reads "The kernel source needs 'option divert' statement added to the other IPFIREWALL statements compiled into a custom kernel." Is this still the case in FreeBSD 6.1? Or am I covered by the IPDIVERT module or someth

Re: Gateway

2006-07-29 Thread Igor Robul
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 01:42:41PM -0400, SigmaX asdf wrote: > >^^^ > >Should be natd_enable="YES" > > > Heh; yeah, typo in my post. The file has it ok. Is there something I have > to do to specify the interfaces which have nat enabled? Does natd_enable > automatically forward

Re: Gateway

2006-07-29 Thread SigmaX asdf
On 7/29/06, Igor Robul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 07:00:18PM -0400, SigmaX asdf wrote: > gateway_enable="YES" > firewall_enable="YES" > firewall_type="OPEN" > natd_enabl="YES" ^^^ Should be natd_enable="YES" Heh; yeah, typo in my post. The file has it

Re: Gateway

2006-07-29 Thread Igor Robul
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 07:00:18PM -0400, SigmaX asdf wrote: > gateway_enable="YES" > firewall_enable="YES" > firewall_type="OPEN" > natd_enabl="YES" ^^^ Should be natd_enable="YES" ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.