Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
>
> > There was a "request" for Tor related problem reports a while ago, I
> > couldn't find the message again, but I believe it was posted here.
>
> I'm very interested in tracking down this problem, but have ha
Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Peter Thoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > To you have pf running? If so can you turn it off for a bit a see
> > > if you still crash. On my box I was getting all sorts of witness
> > > kbd backtraces
Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Thoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > To you have pf running? If so can you turn it off for a bit a see if
> > you still crash. On my box I was getting all sorts of witness kbd
> > backtraces on pf and since turning pf off (maybe a week ago),
> >
Peter Thoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To you have pf running? If so can you turn it off for a bit a see if
> you still crash. On my box I was getting all sorts of witness kbd
> backtraces on pf and since turning pf off (maybe a week ago), haven't
> crashed yet. Going to let it keep running
Hey Fabian,
To you have pf running? If so can you turn it off for a bit a see if
you still crash. On my box I was getting all sorts of witness kbd
backtraces on pf and since turning pf off (maybe a week ago), haven't
crashed yet. Going to let it keep running unmetered for another 2
weeks and see
Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
>
> > > I just got:
> > >
> > > Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: lock order reversal:
> > > Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: 1st 0xc3795000 kqueue (kqueue) @
> > > /usr/src/sys/
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > I just got:
> >
> > Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: lock order reversal:
> > Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: 1st 0xc3795000 kqueue (kqueue) @
> > /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_event.c:1053
> > Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: 2nd
Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > It sounds like your serial console server may not know how to map
> > > SSH break signals into remote serial break signals. Try
> > > ALT_BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER. He
Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It sounds like your serial console server may not know how to map
> > SSH break signals into remote serial break signals. Try
> > ALT_BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER. Here's the description from NOTES:
> >
> > # Solaris im
Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the last episode (Jul 02), Robert Watson said:
> > On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > >The ssh man page offers:
> > >
> > >|~B Send a BREAK to the remote system (only useful for SSH
> > >|protocol version 2 and if the peer supports it
In the last episode (Jul 02), Robert Watson said:
> On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
> >The ssh man page offers:
> >
> >|~B Send a BREAK to the remote system (only useful for SSH
> >|protocol version 2 and if the peer supports it).
> >
> >I am using ssh 2, but the only reaction I
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > I am using ssh 2, but the only reaction I get is a new line.
> >
> > |FreeBSD/i386 (tor.fabiankeil.de) (ttyd0)
> > |
> > |login: ~B
> > |
>
> It sounds like your serial console server may not know how to map SS
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
After manually triggering a test panic through debug.kdb.enter I
could enter ddb and everything seemed to be working.
However today I got another hang and couldn't enter t
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > After manually triggering a test panic through debug.kdb.enter I
> > could enter ddb and everything seemed to be working.
> >
> > However today I got another hang and couldn't enter the debugger by
> > sending B
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
I'm very interested in tracking down this problem, but have had a lot of
trouble getting reliable reports of problems -- i.e., ones where I could
get any debugging information. I had a similar conversation on these lines
yeterday with Roger (Tor author)
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
>
> > There was a "request" for Tor related problem reports a while ago,
> > I couldn't find the message again, but I believe it was posted here.
>
> I'm very interested in tracking down this problem, but have had
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
>
> > I wish I could. The machine died before I read your message.
> >
> > I was logged in on the serial console running tail
> > -f /var/log/messages. Last messages were:
> >
> > Jun 29 00:42:20 tor kernel: Memory
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
I wish I could. The machine died before I read your message.
I was logged in on the serial console running tail -f /var/log/messages.
Last messages were:
Jun 29 00:42:20 tor kernel: Memory modified after free 0xc4275000(2048)
val=a020c0de @ 0xc427500
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
>
> > Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> - Are there any warnings on the console from WITNESS or other
> >> debugging options?
> >
> > I just got:
> >
> > Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: lock order rever
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Are there any warnings on the console from WITNESS or other
debugging options?
I just got:
Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: lock order reversal:
Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: 1st 0xc3795000 kqueue (kqueue) @
/usr/s
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Are there any warnings on the console from WITNESS or other
> debugging options?
I just got:
Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: lock order reversal:
Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: 1st 0xc3795000 kqueue (kqueue) @
/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_event.c:1053
Jun 28 23:0
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
>
> > There was a "request" for Tor related problem reports a while ago,
> > I couldn't find the message again, but I believe it was posted here.
>
> I'm very interested in tracking down this problem, but have had
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Peter Thoenen wrote:
--- Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There was a "request" for Tor related problem reports
a while ago, I couldn't find the message again, but I
believe it was posted here.
Is anyone on this list running a Tor node on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE
or la
Peter Thoenen wrote:
--- Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ ... ]
Is anyone on this list running a Tor node on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE
or later with similar or higher load?
I am hitting the same issue still Fabian. I had that PR closed as
"works for me" with insignificant testing. I am st
--- Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There was a "request" for Tor related problem reports
> a while ago, I couldn't find the message again, but I
> believe it was posted here.
> Is anyone on this list running a Tor node on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE
> or later with similar or higher load?
I am
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote:
There was a "request" for Tor related problem reports a while ago, I
couldn't find the message again, but I believe it was posted here.
I'm very interested in tracking down this problem, but have had a lot of
trouble getting reliable reports of problem
26 matches
Mail list logo
