On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 06:44:06PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/21/2012 17:21, Juergen Lock wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 02:21:49PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> >> [ Removed -current, not relevant to 9.x ]
> >>
> >> On 07/21/2012 11:58, Juergen Lock wrote:
> >>> Hi!
> >>>
> >>> I'm in th
On 07/21/2012 17:21, Juergen Lock wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 02:21:49PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> [ Removed -current, not relevant to 9.x ]
>>
>> On 07/21/2012 11:58, Juergen Lock wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I'm in the process of testing 9.1 on the laptop where I use grub2
>>> because I had to
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 01:40:10PM -0700, Rick wrote:
> Hi Juergen,
Hi!
>
> My email address has changed so don't be alarmed if your CC bounces. :)
Ah yeah I just saw the bounce. :)
> An update of grub2 is long overdue, so I'll work on that right now.
>
Cool, thanx!
Juergen
_
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 02:21:49PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> [ Removed -current, not relevant to 9.x ]
>
> On 07/21/2012 11:58, Juergen Lock wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'm in the process of testing 9.1 on the laptop where I use grub2
> > because I had to put bsd in an `extended' slice, and I found
[ Removed -current, not relevant to 9.x ]
On 07/21/2012 11:58, Juergen Lock wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm in the process of testing 9.1 on the laptop where I use grub2
> because I had to put bsd in an `extended' slice, and I found out
> grub2 won't boot the 9.1 kernel.
Nothing will boot FreeBSD on an e
Hi Juergen,
My email address has changed so don't be alarmed if your CC bounces. :)
An update of grub2 is long overdue, so I'll work on that right now.
-Rick
On 2012/07/21 11:58, Juergen Lock wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm in the process of testing 9.1 on the laptop where I use grub2
> because I had to