On Tuesday, April 26, 2011 17:35:32 Gardner Bell wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 04:25:26PM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> > On Tuesday, April 26, 2011 15:15:45 Gardner Bell wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Bernhard Schmidt
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, April 26, 2011 01:09:42
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 04:25:26PM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 26, 2011 15:15:45 Gardner Bell wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Bernhard Schmidt
> > wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, April 26, 2011 01:09:42 Gardner Bell wrote:
> > >> Downloading a torrent with many peers o
On Tuesday, April 26, 2011 15:15:45 Gardner Bell wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Bernhard Schmidt
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, April 26, 2011 01:09:42 Gardner Bell wrote:
> >> Downloading a torrent with many peers on a toshiba satellite notebook
> >> using an Atheros AR5006 wireless nic cau
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 26, 2011 01:09:42 Gardner Bell wrote:
>> Downloading a torrent with many peers on a toshiba satellite notebook
>> using an Atheros AR5006 wireless nic caused the following panic. This
>> is an i386 system running 8.2-STA
On Tuesday, April 26, 2011 01:09:42 Gardner Bell wrote:
> Downloading a torrent with many peers on a toshiba satellite notebook
> using an Atheros AR5006 wireless nic caused the following panic. This
> is an i386 system running 8.2-STABLE from around April 06.
Can you reproduce that?
A comment a
on 26/04/2011 02:09 Gardner Bell said the following:
> #6 0xc0bcbebc in calltrap () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:166
> #7 0xc0999329 in ieee80211_tx_mgt_timeout (arg=0xc647a000)
> at /usr/src/sys/net80211/ieee80211_output.c:2478
Looks like an issue in wireless code...
--
Andriy Ga
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:39:01 -0400 jhell wrote:
> DDB as I have heard can be configured AFAIR to textdump but I have no
> knowledge of that.
ddb_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf would be enough. But I also remove "textdump
set" in kdb.enter.panic script (/etc/ddb.conf) as I prefer normal dumps (with
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:02, O. Hartmann wrote:
In Message-Id: <4ba294f7.4030...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
On 03/16/10 00:04, O. Hartmann wrote:
On 03/15/10 18:30, Matthew Fleming wrote:
Since the last update and make world on Friday, 12th March I get a
crash
on one of my FreeBSD SMP boxes (it
On 03/16/10 00:04, O. Hartmann wrote:
On 03/15/10 18:30, Matthew Fleming wrote:
Since the last update and make world on Friday, 12th March I get a
crash
on one of my FreeBSD SMP boxes (it is always the same core message),
saying something about
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode [
On 03/15/10 18:30, Matthew Fleming wrote:
Since the last update and make world on Friday, 12th March I get a
crash
on one of my FreeBSD SMP boxes (it is always the same core message),
saying something about
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode [...] current process:
12
(swi2: cambi
> Since the last update and make world on Friday, 12th March I get a
crash
> on one of my FreeBSD SMP boxes (it is always the same core message),
> saying something about
>
> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode [...] current process:
12
> (swi2: cambio)
Can you show the stack traceback
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 05:01:12PM -0500, Boris Kochergin wrote:
> Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> >On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 19:55 -0500, Boris Kochergin wrote:
> >
> >>Ahoy. I recently upgraded an amd64 machine to 7.1-RELEASE, and started
> >>getting a bunch of these at a pretty high frequency (a few hour
Gavin Atkinson wrote:
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 19:55 -0500, Boris Kochergin wrote:
Ahoy. I recently upgraded an amd64 machine to 7.1-RELEASE, and started
getting a bunch of these at a pretty high frequency (a few hours to a
day apart):
http://acm.poly.edu/~spawk/IMG00033.jpg
The "current pro
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 19:55 -0500, Boris Kochergin wrote:
> Ahoy. I recently upgraded an amd64 machine to 7.1-RELEASE, and started
> getting a bunch of these at a pretty high frequency (a few hours to a
> day apart):
>
> http://acm.poly.edu/~spawk/IMG00033.jpg
>
> The "current process" is alway
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 07:55:30PM -0500, Boris Kochergin wrote:
> Ahoy. I recently upgraded an amd64 machine to 7.1-RELEASE, and started
> getting a bunch of these at a pretty high frequency (a few hours to a
> day apart):
>
> http://acm.poly.edu/~spawk/IMG00033.jpg
>
> The "current process" i
Kai Storbeck wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Somewhere our IMAP software triggers this panic, and after some
> searching on my part I've found this report: kern/113823
> (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=113823&cat=kern)
>
> The software I am running is Dovecot serving IMAP to endusers and
> webmai
Hi all,
Somewhere our IMAP software triggers this panic, and after some
searching on my part I've found this report: kern/113823
(http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=113823&cat=kern)
The software I am running is Dovecot serving IMAP to endusers and
webmail clients.
Perhaps one of th
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 12:30:20AM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:55:52AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 05:35:47PM +0200, Kai wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 02:33:29PM +0200, Kai wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:53:32PM +0200,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:55:52AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 05:35:47PM +0200, Kai wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 02:33:29PM +0200, Kai wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:53:32PM +0200, Kai wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > We're running into
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 05:35:47PM +0200, Kai wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 02:33:29PM +0200, Kai wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:53:32PM +0200, Kai wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > We're running into regular panics on our webserver after upgrading
> > > from 4.x to 6.2-stable:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 01:27:27PM +0100, Tom Judge wrote:
> Kai wrote:
> >On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 04:14:23PM +0200, Christian Walther wrote:
> >
> >>On 19/04/07, Kai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:53:32PM +0200, Kai wrote:
> >>>
> Hello all,
>
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 02:33:29PM +0200, Kai wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:53:32PM +0200, Kai wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > We're running into regular panics on our webserver after upgrading
> > from 4.x to 6.2-stable:
>
Hi all,
To continue this story, a colleague wrote a small prog
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 02:33:29PM +0200, Kai wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:53:32PM +0200, Kai wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> We're running into regular panics on our webserver after upgrading
> from 4.x to 6.2-stable:
Hi Again,
The panics keep happening, so I'm trying alter
Kai wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 04:14:23PM +0200, Christian Walther wrote:
On 19/04/07, Kai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:53:32PM +0200, Kai wrote:
Hello all,
We're running into regular panics on our webserver after upgrading
from 4.x to 6.2-stable:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 04:14:23PM +0200, Christian Walther wrote:
> On 19/04/07, Kai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:53:32PM +0200, Kai wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> We're running into regular panics on our webserver after upgrading
> >> from 4.x to 6.2-stable:
> >
On 19/04/07, Kai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:53:32PM +0200, Kai wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> We're running into regular panics on our webserver after upgrading
> from 4.x to 6.2-stable:
Hi Again,
The panics keep happening, so I'm trying alternate kernel setups. This is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm up and running on the patch now as well ...
- --On Sunday, January 07, 2007 17:02:40 -0800 Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:03:41 + (GMT)
>> From: Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sender: [EMAIL PROT
> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:03:41 + (GMT)
> From: Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > Just had the following happen on a FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #7: Sun Dec 17>
> > 01:28:52 AST 2006 system ... amd64, HP Proliant,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Working on upgrading and applying patch right now ... thanks ...
- --On Sunday, January 07, 2007 14:03:41 + Robert Watson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>> Just had the following happen on a FreeBSD
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Just had the following happen on a FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #7: Sun Dec 17
01:28:52 AST 2006 system ... amd64, HP Proliant, 6G of RAM ... have core if
there is information that I can provide out of it ...
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mod
in case someone is keep tracking this - I can confirm that the issue
seems to went away since about week old RELENG_6.
--
Vlad
On 3/17/06, Vlad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and here comes another fresh one
>
> # kgdb kernel.debug /var/crash/vmcore.1
> [GDB will not be able to debug user-mode th
I have a similar crash from
6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #1: Sun Mar 19 13:28:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 09:01:05PM -0600, Vlad wrote:
i
> Ok, thanks for Joe's hint I was able to get stuff captured:
>
> # kgdb kernel.debug /var/crash/vmcore.0
...
> #9 0x8037ee2b in calltrap () at .
and here comes another fresh one
# kgdb kernel.debug /var/crash/vmcore.1
[GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads:
/usr/lib/libthread_db.so: Undefined symbol "ps_pglobal_lookup"]
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU
Ok, thanks for Joe's hint I was able to get stuff captured:
# kgdb kernel.debug /var/crash/vmcore.0
[GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads:
/usr/lib/libthread_db.so: Undefined symbol "ps_pglobal_lookup"]
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free so
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 11:41:58AM -0600, Vlad wrote:
> no, nothing like that. and it reboots several times a day.
>
> also, I have my swap twice less than physical mem, so I can't get a
> dump (btw, there was a patch for to gzip core before it stores it into
> swap, so it can be fit in swap of s
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 11:46:03AM -0600, Vlad wrote:
> I have Putty logging stuff and I guess it's either part of its
> keepalive packets.
OK, thanks.
Kris
pgp9bQOumoHeI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I have Putty logging stuff and I guess it's either part of its
keepalive packets.
On 3/17/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 11:41:58AM -0600, Vlad wrote:
> > no, nothing like that. and it reboots several times a day.
>
> Where do the online/offline messages co
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 11:41:58AM -0600, Vlad wrote:
> no, nothing like that. and it reboots several times a day.
Where do the online/offline messages come from?
Kris
pgptmL30y88dA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
no, nothing like that. and it reboots several times a day.
also, I have my swap twice less than physical mem, so I can't get a
dump (btw, there was a patch for to gzip core before it stores it into
swap, so it can be fit in swap of smaller size - anyone has it?)
On 3/17/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 10:59:40AM -0600, Vlad wrote:
> this is 6.0-STABLE as for Mar 17.
Are you using kernel mode ppp? If so, don't.
Kris
pgp3tycV8zjpL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 02:47 am, Yuri Khotyaintsev wrote:
> On Friday 02 December 2005 14.54, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Friday 02 December 2005 05:00 am, Yuri Khotyaintsev wrote:
> > > I have the following panic occurring several times a week. The machine
> > > is an NFS server, and it usua
On Friday 02 December 2005 14.54, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday 02 December 2005 05:00 am, Yuri Khotyaintsev wrote:
> > I have the following panic occurring several times a week. The machine is
> > an NFS server, and it usually panics early in the morning, when first
> > people try to access it.
On Friday 02 December 2005 14.54, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday 02 December 2005 05:00 am, Yuri Khotyaintsev wrote:
> > I have the following panic occurring several times a week. The machine is
> > an NFS server, and it usually panics early in the morning, when first
> > people try to access it.
On Friday 02 December 2005 05:00 am, Yuri Khotyaintsev wrote:
> I have the following panic occurring several times a week. The machine is
> an NFS server, and it usually panics early in the morning, when first
> people try to access it. After reboot it may work OK for 1-2 days, and then
> panics ag
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 04:40:58PM +0100, Mario Pranjic wrote:
> > Is there a possibility that a memory chip is dead (or should I say
> > deadish)?
>
> As I said, the memory died. :)
> The Memtest86 returned a lot of errors. I've replaced the memory module
> and now it seems all right.
It's so ni
> Is there a possibility that a memory chip is dead (or should I say
> deadish)?
As I said, the memory died. :)
The Memtest86 returned a lot of errors. I've replaced the memory module
and now it seems all right.
Mario Pranjic, dipl.ing.
sistem administrator
Knjiznica, Institut Rudjer Boskovic
---
46 matches
Mail list logo
