Re: Call for testers: FPU changes

2010-11-20 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 01:30:54AM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 11/16/2010 4:43 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:42:50PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > >> On 11/15/2010 4:13 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > >>> > >>> Patch is at > >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/releng_8

Re: Call for testers: FPU changes

2010-11-19 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 11/16/2010 4:43 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:42:50PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: >> On 11/15/2010 4:13 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote: >>> >>> Patch is at >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/releng_8_fpu.1.patch I did some more tests post commit today using the aesni kl

Re: Call for testers: FPU changes

2010-11-18 Thread Daryl Richards
Not sure if this is the kind of testing you were looking for; but I've run both mprime and boinc/setiathome for the last two days without any problem... It's not a notebook so I can't test suspend/resume.. On 10-11-15 4:13 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > Hello, > this is a call for testers of the me

Re: Call for testers: FPU changes

2010-11-18 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 11/17/2010 11:35 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > Meantime, the similar change may be beneficial for padlock(4) too. > f you are going to test it, please note that most likely, openssl padlock > engine does not use padlock(4), I do not know for sure. I did some more tests since someone said the

Re: Call for testers: FPU changes

2010-11-17 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 02:18:50PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 11/17/2010 11:35 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > Meantime, the similar change may be beneficial for padlock(4) too. > > f you are going to test it, please note that most likely, openssl padlock > > engine does not use padlock(4), I do

Re: Call for testers: FPU changes

2010-11-17 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 11/17/2010 11:35 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > Meantime, the similar change may be beneficial for padlock(4) too. > f you are going to test it, please note that most likely, openssl padlock > engine does not use padlock(4), I do not know for sure. > > diff --git a/sys/crypto/via/padlock.c b/sys/

Re: Call for testers: FPU changes

2010-11-17 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 08:46:23PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 11/16/2010 5:19 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > Would your conclusion be that the patch seems to increase the throughput > > of the aesni(4) ? > > > > I think that on small-sized blocks, when using aesni(4), the dominating > > factor

Re: Call for testers: FPU changes

2010-11-16 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 11/16/2010 5:19 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > Would your conclusion be that the patch seems to increase the throughput > of the aesni(4) ? > > I think that on small-sized blocks, when using aesni(4), the dominating > factor is the copying/copyout of the data to/from the kernel address > space. S

Re: Call for testers: FPU changes

2010-11-16 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 05:08:30PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 11/16/2010 4:43 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:42:50PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > >> On 11/15/2010 4:13 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > >>> > >>> Patch is at > >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/releng_8

Re: Call for testers: FPU changes

2010-11-16 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 11/16/2010 4:43 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:42:50PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: >> On 11/15/2010 4:13 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote: >>> >>> Patch is at >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/releng_8_fpu.1.patch >> >> >> Hi, >> One small failure on the patch >> >> Th

Re: Call for testers: FPU changes

2010-11-16 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:42:50PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 11/15/2010 4:13 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > > > Patch is at > > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/releng_8_fpu.1.patch > > > Hi, > One small failure on the patch > > The text leading up to this was: > -

Re: Call for testers: FPU changes

2010-11-15 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 11/15/2010 4:13 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > Patch is at > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/releng_8_fpu.1.patch Hi, One small failure on the patch The text leading up to this was: -- |Index: pc98/include/npx.h |===