Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is no patch for ata-all.c there is a replacement. I will
> eventually get that updated (so you can run cvs diff ?)...
OK, thanks.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebs
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3j.diff-releng5.gz
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3j.diff-current.gz
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3j.tar.gz
sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c rev 1.235 conflicts, could you please update the
Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3j.diff-releng5.gz
> http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3j.diff-current.gz
> http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3j.tar.gz
sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c rev 1.235 conflicts, could you please update the
-CURRENT patch?
DES
Sorry to be a BOFH, but could you guys stop crossposting on this topic? I
think -current is more suitable for this.
Thanks.
* Hides in corner *
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To uns
Randy Bush wrote:
Since I cannot debug this, I have no way of finding out whats wrong.
I will look at it when ACPI allows me to use suspend/resume again, until
then I'll concentrated on things that I can work on...
where's my refund? :-)
more seriously, shall we do a fund to get you a laptoy on
> Since I cannot debug this, I have no way of finding out whats wrong.
> I will look at it when ACPI allows me to use suspend/resume again, until
> then I'll concentrated on things that I can work on...
where's my refund? :-)
more seriously, shall we do a fund to get you a laptoy on which
acpi
Randy Bush wrote:
diff -u -r1.20 ata-all.c
--- ata-all.c 2005/02/03 17:02:31 1.20
+++ ata-all.c 2005/02/07 14:27:57
@@ -630,7 +630,7 @@
void
ata_udelay(int interval)
{
-if (1 || interval < (100/hz) || ata_delayed_attach)
+if (interval < (100/hz) || ata_delayed_attach)
> diff -u -r1.20 ata-all.c
> --- ata-all.c 2005/02/03 17:02:31 1.20
> +++ ata-all.c 2005/02/07 14:27:57
> @@ -630,7 +630,7 @@
> void
> ata_udelay(int interval)
> {
> -if (1 || interval < (100/hz) || ata_delayed_attach)
> +if (interval < (100/hz) || ata_delayed_attach)
>
Arne Schwabe wrote:
SÃren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Randy Bush wrote:
After suspend, my ThinkPad X40 now hangs with following logs (copied
by hand):
Hmm, do you have ATA compiled in or as modules. I could easily
imagine that modules could have problems, but as "built in" nothing
really c
SÃren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Randy Bush wrote:
After suspend, my ThinkPad X40 now hangs with following logs (copied
by hand):
>>>
>>> Hmm, do you have ATA compiled in or as modules. I could easily
>>> imagine that modules could have problems, but as "built in" nothing
>>> re
>> my patched t41, current with ata in the kernel, locks up with disk
>> light on solid on resume.
> Does it work with stock ATA ?
it did last week, before i rebuilt with patch
> I cant work on suspend/resume as it has been broken due to ACPI
> brokenness since september last year on all my lapt
Randy Bush wrote:
After suspend, my ThinkPad X40 now hangs with following logs (copied
by hand):
Hmm, do you have ATA compiled in or as modules. I could easily imagine
that modules could have problems, but as "built in" nothing really
changed...
my patched t41, current with ata in the kernel, loc
>> After suspend, my ThinkPad X40 now hangs with following logs (copied
>> by hand):
> Hmm, do you have ATA compiled in or as modules. I could easily imagine
> that modules could have problems, but as "built in" nothing really
> changed...
my patched t41, current with ata in the kernel, locks up
>>> On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 14:29:03 +0100, Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hideyuki KURASHINA wrote:
> > Hi, Søren
>
> > I've tested your patches using same config file as before, and it seems
> > work fine except on resume.
>
> Hmm, thats one corner I cant test, suspend/resume dies horr
Hideyuki KURASHINA wrote:
Hi, Søren
I've tested your patches using same config file as before, and it seems
work fine except on resume.
Hmm, thats one corner I cant test, suspend/resume dies horribly in ACPI
on all 3 notebooks I have since september last year or thereabouts...
After suspend, my
Hi, Søren
>>> On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:52:57 +0100, Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> ATA-mkIII first official snapshot.
[...]
> No changes are needed to your config file, unless you want ATA as modules.
I've tested your patches using same config file as before, and it seems
work fine exce
Søren Schmidt wrote:
ATA-mkIII first official snapshot.
This is the much rumoured ATA update that I've been working on for
some time.
Is this coming in 5.4-RELEASE?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
Ben Stuyts wrote:
On 3 Feb 2005, at 21:52, Søren Schmidt wrote:
o ATA RAID can only read metadata not write them. This means that
arrays can be picked up from the BIOS, but they cannot be created
from FreeBSD. This is being worked on for the final release as is
RAID5 s
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 21:52 +0100, SÃren Schmidt wrote:
> ATA-mkIII first official snapshot.
>
> This is the much rumoured ATA update that I've been working on for some time.
>
> It contains a number of new things, and lacks a few features of the old code.
>
> New items include:
>
> o ATA
> From: Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:04:56 -0800
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> makes my tp41 running current boot without crashing. i
> demand a refund! :-)
Randy,
We have refunded your money so often that we're running out of empty
pockets to get the funds from.
makes my tp41 running current boot without crashing. i
demand a refund! :-)
randy
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 3 Feb 2005, at 21:52, Søren Schmidt wrote:
o ATA RAID can only read metadata not write them. This means that
arrays can be picked up from the BIOS, but they cannot be
created
from FreeBSD. This is being worked on for the final release as
is
RAID5 support for Promi
On 02/03/05 14:52, Søren Schmidt wrote:
ATA-mkIII first official snapshot.
This is the much rumoured ATA update that I've been working on for some
time.
It contains a number of new things, and lacks a few features of the old
code.
New items include:
o ATA is now fully newbus'd and split i
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 18:40:43 -0800, Pascal Hofstee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only thing i was curious about is if there is any way to build the
> kernel-module using ATA_STATIC_ID .. (as i used to do in my normal
> kernel-configs)
Ok .. I whacked myself with the proverbial clue-stick .. and
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:52:57 +0100, Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ATA-mkIII first official snapshot.
Using it without any problems on a few days old 6.0-CURRENT (P2 400 MHz)
I decided to take the plunge and go for the kernel-module-approach.
The only thing i was curious about is if t
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 09:52:57PM +0100, S?ren Schmidt wrote:
>
> As usual, even if it works on all the HW I have here in the lab, thats by
> far not the same as it works on YOUR system. So use glowes and safety shoes
> and if it breaks I dont want the pieces, but would like to hear the nifty
> d
26 matches
Mail list logo
