On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:51:56 -0800, Brooks Davis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ALTQ makes no sense of virtual interfaces. ALTQ works by providing
> fine-grained control of the dequeueing of packets on to the wire. It's
> too early to do this when you're still in the virtual interface.
PF does not
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 05:00:32PM +1030, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
> 0n Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 12:51:56PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
>
> >FYI, spl*() funtions are all no-ops now. We just have them around to
> >remind us that we need to lock certain functions and to document what
> >w
0n Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 12:51:56PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
>FYI, spl*() funtions are all no-ops now. We just have them around to
>remind us that we need to lock certain functions and to document what
>was protected before.
What is meant by "no-ops" ?
- aW
__
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 12:32:55PM -0800, Jon Simola wrote:
> I just whipped up this against
> 5.3-STABLE #1: Wed Dec 22 17:11:02 PST 2004
>
> Would someone who knows a bit more about this than myself give it a
> quick lookover and see if it appears sane? I'm mostly wondering about
> the splimp()
