I'll be glad to run buildworld on one of my machines whenever I get
connection/internet service again. I'm stating this and emphasizing the
previous email because I never had such problems on any of my PPC machines.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Super Bisquit wrote:
> Why not compare native bu
Why not compare native builds to tinderbox?
2012/1/4 Dag-Erling Smørgrav
> Garrett Cooper writes:
> > That's not relevant to these errors. For some odd reason tinderbox
> > takes 1-2 iterations to reach equilibrium when someone makes a data
> > structure change, even a change to a header and C
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 01:53:46AM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
> TB --- 2012-01-03 23:59:19 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
> TB --- 2012-01-03 23:59:19 - starting RELENG_9 tinderbox run for
> powerpc/powerpc
> TB --- 2012-01-03 23:59:19 - cleaning the object tree
> TB ---
(mav@, powerpc@, stable@, SuperBisquit BCCed)
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 05:31:15PM -0500, Super Bisquit wrote:
>> I still say that the system should be built natively on powerpc equipment.
>
> What relevancy does that have to the situation?
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 05:31:15PM -0500, Super Bisquit wrote:
> I still say that the system should be built natively on powerpc equipment.
What relevancy does that have to the situation? We're seeing the same
for other architectures, not just powerpc.
4516 01/02 21:53 FreeBSD Tinderbox (
I still say that the system should be built natively on powerpc equipment.
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:15 PM, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
> TB --- 2012-01-02 22:07:52 - tinderbox 2.8 running on
> freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
> TB --- 2012-01-02 22:07:52 - starting RELENG_9 tinderbox run for
> powerpc/power
