On 14 Oct 2011 21:50, "Stefan Bethke" wrote:
>
>
> Am 14.10.2011 um 14:03 schrieb Jilles Tjoelker:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:25:35PM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
> >> On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 01:27:07AM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
> >>> I won't be in a position to create a simpler test ca
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 10:45:18PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 11:50:22 +0200 Stefan Bethke wrote:
> SB> Seems to do the trick, thanks!
> Thanks for testing! Committed. I am going to MFC it soon.
Gentlemen, thank you!
I can confirm that at $JOB with a RELENG_8 system post t
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 11:50:22 +0200 Stefan Bethke wrote:
SB> Am 15.10.2011 um 09:36 schrieb Mikolaj Golub:
>>
>> On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 22:50:32 +0200 Stefan Bethke wrote:
>>
>> SB> I finally figured out why my ports aren't updating anymore: when
>> running portupgrade -a --batch from cron,
Am 15.10.2011 um 09:36 schrieb Mikolaj Golub:
>
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 22:50:32 +0200 Stefan Bethke wrote:
>
> SB> I finally figured out why my ports aren't updating anymore: when running
> portupgrade -a --batch from cron, stdin is /dev/null, and that produces the
> gobs of ^D in the output, a
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 22:50:32 +0200 Stefan Bethke wrote:
SB> I finally figured out why my ports aren't updating anymore: when running
portupgrade -a --batch from cron, stdin is /dev/null, and that produces the
gobs of ^D in the output, as well as the script file that portupgrade creates.
What
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:03:37 +0200 Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
JT> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:25:35PM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 01:27:07AM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
>> > I won't be in a position to create a simpler test case, raise a PR or
>> > try patches till T
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:25:35 +0100 Adrian Wontroba wrote:
AW> On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 01:27:07AM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
>> I won't be in a position to create a simpler test case, raise a PR or
>> try patches till Tuesday evening (UK) at the earliest.
AW> So far I have been unable to r
Am 14.10.2011 um 14:03 schrieb Jilles Tjoelker:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:25:35PM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 01:27:07AM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
>>> I won't be in a position to create a simpler test case, raise a PR or
>>> try patches till Tuesday evening (UK
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:25:35PM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 01:27:07AM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
> > I won't be in a position to create a simpler test case, raise a PR or
> > try patches till Tuesday evening (UK) at the earliest.
> So far I have been unable to re
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 01:27:07AM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
> I won't be in a position to create a simpler test case, raise a PR or
> try patches till Tuesday evening (UK) at the earliest.
So far I have been unable to reproduce the problem with portupgrade (and
will probably move to portmaste
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 02:15:24PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> For the record. The issue has been fixed in CURRENT and the fix has
> been merged to STABLE.
At $JOB with a recent version of RELENG_8 and the new script (1.24.30.5
2011/10/04 11:08:31 trociny) I am getting hangs (system close to idl
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 18:34:07 +0200 Michiel Boland wrote:
MB> On 10/04/2011 13:15, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
MB> [...]
>>>
>>> I believe the behaviour is after this commit:
>>>
>>> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=125
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:15:24 +0200, Mikolaj Golub
wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Mikolaj Golub
wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 08:47:13 +0200 Ronald Klop wrote:
RK> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 07:39:01 +0200, Jeremy Chadwick
RK> wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:54:13AM -0400, Jason
On 10/04/2011 13:15, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
[...]
I believe the behaviour is after this commit:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=125848
I think we should skip select on STDIN after reading EOF from it, like in the
patc
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 08:47:13 +0200 Ronald Klop wrote:
>
> RK> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 07:39:01 +0200, Jeremy Chadwick
> RK> wrote:
>
> >> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:54:13AM -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 01:49
On Sep 18, 2011 11:25 AM, "Kostik Belousov" wrote:
> Please note that interpreting the receiving of 0 bytes on the terminal
> as EOF is only a convention. If done absolutely properly, script shall
> not interpret zero-byte read as EOF. Might be, the reasonable thing to
> do would be to only look a
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 11:57:57PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:24:23 +0300 Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> KB> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 02:54:34PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:25:26 +0200 Ronald Klop wrote:
> >>
> >> RK> It is a while s
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:24:23 +0300 Kostik Belousov wrote:
KB> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 02:54:34PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:25:26 +0200 Ronald Klop wrote:
>>
>> RK> It is a while since I programmed C, but why will writing 0 bytes give
>> RK> the reader an e
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 02:54:34PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:25:26 +0200 Ronald Klop wrote:
>
> RK> It is a while since I programmed C, but why will writing 0 bytes give
> RK> the reader an end-of-file? Shouldn't the fd be closed to indicate
> RK> end-of-file?
>
>
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:25:26 +0200 Ronald Klop wrote:
RK> It is a while since I programmed C, but why will writing 0 bytes give
RK> the reader an end-of-file? Shouldn't the fd be closed to indicate
RK> end-of-file?
AFAIR, this trick with writing 0 to emulate EOF because we can't close the fd
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 08:47:13 +0200 Ronald Klop wrote:
RK> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 07:39:01 +0200, Jeremy Chadwick
RK> wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:54:13AM -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 01:49:15AM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > I'm running
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 12:58:32 +0200, Mikolaj Golub
wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 08:47:13 +0200 Ronald Klop wrote:
RK> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 07:39:01 +0200, Jeremy Chadwick
RK> wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:54:13AM -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 01:49:15AM
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 08:47:13AM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 07:39:01 +0200, Jeremy Chadwick
> wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:54:13AM -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> >>On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 01:49:15AM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I'm running por
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 07:39:01 +0200, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:54:13AM -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 01:49:15AM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running portupgrade in screen to update all the ports for
> 9-BETA2/9-CURRENT on amd64. Whil
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:54:13AM -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 01:49:15AM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm running portupgrade in screen to update all the ports for
> > 9-BETA2/9-CURRENT on amd64. While doing this script eats 100% cpu.
> > Because portup
25 matches
Mail list logo
