Re: RFC vgrind in base (and buildworld)

2011-01-23 Thread Michel Talon
Damien Fleuriot wrote: > I think I'm speaking for a reasonable amount of people when I say: I > have no idea what vgrind is used for to begin with. Anyways, there is also a reasonable number of people who know what vgrind is about: pretty printing various source codes through troff particularly C

Re: RFC vgrind in base (and buildworld)

2011-01-23 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 1/21/11 11:20 PM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > On Thu, 20.01.2011 at 21:17:40 +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Currently our buildworld relies on groff(1) and vgrind(1) being present >> in the host system. I have a patch ready that at least makes sure these >> are built during bootstr

Re: RFC vgrind in base (and buildworld)

2011-01-22 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 23:11:43 +0100 Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > On Thu, 20.01.2011 at 15:31:03 -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:17:40 +0100 > > Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Currently our buildworld relies on groff(1) and vgrind(1) being > > > present

Re: RFC vgrind in base (and buildworld)

2011-01-22 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:58:25AM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 23:20:09 +0100 > Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote: > > > On Thu, 20.01.2011 at 21:17:40 +0100, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Currently our buildworld relies on groff(1) and vgrind(1) being present > > >

Re: RFC vgrind in base (and buildworld)

2011-01-22 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 23:20:09 +0100 Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > On Thu, 20.01.2011 at 21:17:40 +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Currently our buildworld relies on groff(1) and vgrind(1) being present > > in the host system. I have a patch ready that at least makes sure these > > are

Re: RFC vgrind in base (and buildworld)

2011-01-21 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Thu, 20.01.2011 at 21:17:40 +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > Hello, > > Currently our buildworld relies on groff(1) and vgrind(1) being present > in the host system. I have a patch ready that at least makes sure these > are built during bootstrap-tools and completes the WITHOUT_GROFF flag. > >

Re: RFC vgrind in base (and buildworld)

2011-01-21 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Jan 21, 2011, at 7:25 AM, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:11:13 -0800 > Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > >> >> On Jan 20, 2011, at 12:31 PM, Alexander Kabaev wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:17:40 +0100 >>> Ulrich Spörlein wrote: >>> Hello, Currently our bui

Re: RFC vgrind in base (and buildworld)

2011-01-21 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:11:13 -0800 Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > On Jan 20, 2011, at 12:31 PM, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > > On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:17:40 +0100 > > Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> Currently our buildworld relies on groff(1) and vgrind(1) being > >> present in t

Re: RFC vgrind in base (and buildworld)

2011-01-20 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Jan 20, 2011, at 12:31 PM, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:17:40 +0100 > Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Currently our buildworld relies on groff(1) and vgrind(1) being >> present in the host system. I have a patch ready that at least makes >> sure these are built

Re: RFC vgrind in base (and buildworld)

2011-01-20 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Thu, 20.01.2011 at 15:31:03 -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:17:40 +0100 > Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Currently our buildworld relies on groff(1) and vgrind(1) being > > present in the host system. I have a patch ready that at least makes > > sure these

Re: RFC vgrind in base (and buildworld)

2011-01-20 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:17:40 +0100 Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > Hello, > > Currently our buildworld relies on groff(1) and vgrind(1) being > present in the host system. I have a patch ready that at least makes > sure these are built during bootstrap-tools and completes the > WITHOUT_GROFF flag. > >

RFC vgrind in base (and buildworld)

2011-01-20 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
Hello, Currently our buildworld relies on groff(1) and vgrind(1) being present in the host system. I have a patch ready that at least makes sure these are built during bootstrap-tools and completes the WITHOUT_GROFF flag. vgrind(1) is only used for two papers under share/doc and we could easily e