Re: RELEASE_6 -> RELEASE_8

2011-01-31 Thread Clifton Royston
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:45:33AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote: > > I was trying to upgrade a machine from RELEASE_6 (latest) > to RELEASE_8 (latest) via source. I was unable to get > make buildworld to complete. ... > Sorry this report is not more complete as I blew away th

Re: RELEASE_6 -> RELEASE_8

2011-01-31 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Mark Andrews wrote: I was trying to upgrade a machine from RELEASE_6 (latest) to RELEASE_8 (latest) via source. I was unable to get make buildworld to complete. You need latest N to go to N+1, so a 6.4-RELEASE or RELENG_6 after that should be able

Re: RELEASE_6 -> RELEASE_8

2011-01-30 Thread Mark Andrews
Mark Andrews writes: > > In message <4d46119f.5060...@sentex.net>, Mike Tancsa writes: > > On 1/30/2011 6:45 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > > I was trying to upgrade a machine from RELEASE_6 (latest) > > > to RELEASE_8 (latest) via source. I was unable to get > > > make buildworld to complete

Re: RELEASE_6 -> RELEASE_8

2011-01-30 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <4d46119f.5060...@sentex.net>, Mike Tancsa writes: > On 1/30/2011 6:45 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > I was trying to upgrade a machine from RELEASE_6 (latest) > > to RELEASE_8 (latest) via source. I was unable to get > > make buildworld to complete. > > Strange, I have done

Re: RELEASE_6 -> RELEASE_8

2011-01-30 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 1/30/2011 6:45 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > I was trying to upgrade a machine from RELEASE_6 (latest) > to RELEASE_8 (latest) via source. I was unable to get > make buildworld to complete. Strange, I have done a number of machines going from RELENG_6, RELENG_7 and then RELENG_8

RELEASE_6 -> RELEASE_8

2011-01-30 Thread Mark Andrews
I was trying to upgrade a machine from RELEASE_6 (latest) to RELEASE_8 (latest) via source. I was unable to get make buildworld to complete. There were two problems sets of problems. libelf and sys headers were not available to some of the solaris