on 11/01/2013 17:09 Po-Li Soong said the following:
> (kgdb) p/x *(struct vm_object *)0x81281580
[snip]
>
> (kgdb) p/x *(struct vm_page *)0xfe00cd733ab0
> $2 = {pageq = {tqe_next = 0x0, tqe_prev = 0xfe00c7e7d678}, listq = {
> tqe_next = 0xfe00cd733b28, tqe_prev = 0xfe0
on 14/01/2013 22:04 Po-Li Soong said the following:
> First of all, I agree with you that it would be very strange to have crashed
> at vm_page_free_toq+0x45, by which point m (in the register rbx. See below
> for the assembly listing.) has been dereferenced a few times. However, there
> is a discr
nothing to cause page fault if the m pointer itself is valid.
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Konstantin Belousov [mailto:kostik...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 4:49 PM
> To: Po-Li Soong
> Cc: sta...@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: zio_done panic
nter itself
is valid.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Konstantin Belousov [mailto:kostik...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 4:49 PM
> To: Po-Li Soong
> Cc: sta...@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: zio_done panic on unadulterated FreeBSD Release 9.1
>
>
On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:03:38 -0500, Po-Li Soong
wrote:
Hi,
My name is Po-Li Soong. I ran into a crash not long after installing the
9.1 release on my home machine. I was performing a test run of file
transfer with samba server running on the FreeBSD installation. The
transfer rate was
rg
Subject: Re: zio_done panic on unadulterated FreeBSD Release 9.1
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:03:38PM +, Po-Li Soong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My name is Po-Li Soong. I ran into a crash not long after installing the 9.1
> release on my home machine. I was performing a test run of file
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:03:38PM +, Po-Li Soong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My name is Po-Li Soong. I ran into a crash not long after installing the 9.1
> release on my home machine. I was performing a test run of file transfer with
> samba server running on the FreeBSD installation. The transfer rat
