On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, tony wrote:
> is this documented somewhere? when I left the maxusers at 0 it said
> something along the lines of "max users set to 0, assuming 8" now 8
> seems very low to me, will that in some way automatically grow during
> normal operation of the system?
You are probabl
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> > See, people keep saying it's in the handbook, and I keep reading:
> >
> > doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig/chapter.sgml
>
> Truely strange, it is in the handbook, but not in the above, maybe it
> hasn't been regenerated late
> See, people keep saying it's in the handbook, and I keep reading:
>
> doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig/chapter.sgml
>
Truely strange, it is in the handbook, but not in the above, maybe it
hasn't been regenerated lately?
--
David W. Chapman Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Raintree N
If memory serves me right, "tony" wrote:
> is this documented somewhere?
Release notes, tuning(7), coming soon to the Handbook I believe.
> when I left the maxusers at 0 it said
> something along the lines of "max users set to 0, assuming 8" now 8 seems
> very low to me, will that in some way au
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Lawrence Sica wrote:
> > And it should even appear in the handbook, which last I checked it still
> > didn't.
>
> It is in the handbook, that is how i ended the argument with some people
> :)
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/configtuning-kerne
D]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bruce A. Mah
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Nevermind
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: we should note "maxusers 0" in UPDATING
If memory serves me right, Nevermind wrote:
> I suppose we sh
Hello, Ruslan Ermilov!
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 06:23:25PM +0200, you wrote:
> > > I suppose we should note that using in kernel "maxusers 0"
> > > is now default and recomended setting now.
> >
> > UPDATING is for issues that could potentially cause a system to break
> > during an upgrade. T
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 07:57:37AM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> If memory serves me right, Nevermind wrote:
>
> > I suppose we should note that using in kernel "maxusers 0"
> > is now default and recomended setting now.
>
> UPDATING is for issues that could potentially cause a system to break
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Nevermind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 8:15 AM
Subject: Re: we should note &quo
- Original Message -
From: "Nevermind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 7:11 AM
Subject: we should note "maxusers 0" in UPDATING
> Hello,
>
> I suppose we should note that using in kernel "maxusers 0"
>
And it should even appear in the handbook, which last I checked it still
didn't.
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project
[EMAIL PROTECTED] NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Nevermind wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I suppose we should note that using
11 matches
Mail list logo
