Re: vinum or gvinum

2005-09-09 Thread David Magda
On Sep 9, 2005, at 07:31, Michael Butler wrote: Swap is the first slice which is not mirrored and the second slice contains the bootable file-system which is mirrored. What happens to a running system if the disk dies and swap suddenly disappears? :) __

RE: vinum or gvinum

2005-09-09 Thread Tomas Palfi
To: Tomas Palfi Subject: Re: vinum or gvinum Hi, On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:04:42PM +0100, Tomas Palfi wrote: > Thanks for this update, I am configuring the gmirror as per the > instructions, however, there is one thing which bothers me a bit. > > bsdlabel -e /dev/mirror/gm0s1 when

Re: vinum or gvinum

2005-09-09 Thread Michael Butler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tommi Lätti wrote: | I have to vouch for gmirror system. I have three production machines | here running and booting from gmirror on since 5.3-REL and they're all | doing fine. Even after I upgraded 5.3 -> 5.4 and during the first boot | I saw the

Re: vinum or gvinum

2005-09-08 Thread Tommi Lätti
On 8.9.2005, at 21.26, Stijn Hoop wrote: By the way, you can also consider geom_mirror, for which an excellent article is available here: http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/mirror/ Both gvinum and gmirror approaches are able to boot from a mirrored system disk. It depends on other factors whic

Re: vinum or gvinum

2005-09-08 Thread Stijn Hoop
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:20:47PM +0100, Tomas Palfi wrote: > I thought I could check previous gvinum config with the gvinum> list > command in its own shell. When I run this command for either gvinum or > vinum, they both reported no volumes. You should be able to use the list command to view th

RE: vinum or gvinum

2005-09-08 Thread Tomas Palfi
tp -Original Message- From: Stijn Hoop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 September 2005 13:09 To: Tomas Palfi Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vinum or gvinum On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:59:27PM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote: > Did you start from scratch by wiping the

Re: vinum or gvinum

2005-09-08 Thread Stijn Hoop
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:59:27PM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote: > Did you start from scratch by wiping the former configuration without loading > gvinum? > > Use > > # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0 bs=1m count=128 > > to be sure. Do this WITHOUT loading any of the vinum modules. :( Forgot to add a bi

Re: vinum or gvinum

2005-09-08 Thread Stijn Hoop
Hi, First: do _NOT_ use vinum on 5.4, use gvinum. On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:43:01PM +0100, Tomas Palfi wrote: > I am still struggling to set up a one way mirror on two 72GB disks on > 5.4 intel platform, however, there seems to be a lot of confusion about > what to use in the first place. this i

Re: vinum or gvinum on FreeBSD 5.4

2005-04-21 Thread Paul Mather
On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 04:48 +0200, Vladimir Botka wrote: > Hi, > vinum is not stable under 5.4. After some "research" I found gmirror > (RAID1) is ok. There are some notes on: > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/errata.html > > Cheers, > > Vladimir. > > On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Paul Mather wrote

Re: vinum or gvinum on FreeBSD 5.4

2005-04-21 Thread Vladimir Botka
Hi, vinum is not stable under 5.4. After some "research" I found gmirror (RAID1) is ok. There are some notes on: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/errata.html Cheers, Vladimir. On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Paul Mather wrote: On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 10:39 +0200, Claus Guttesen wrote: Hi. I may implement

Re: vinum or gvinum on FreeBSD 5.4

2005-04-21 Thread Paul Mather
> On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 10:39 +0200, Claus Guttesen wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I may implement (g)vinum to stripe two 2 TB raid 5 volumes into a > > single 4 TB vinum-volume. The volumes reside on a atabeast doing the > > raid 5. The server is a 5.4 RC2 doing nfs on i386. > > > > According to some th

Re: vinum or gvinum on FreeBSD 5.4

2005-04-21 Thread Paul Mather
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 10:39 +0200, Claus Guttesen wrote: > Hi. > > I may implement (g)vinum to stripe two 2 TB raid 5 volumes into a > single 4 TB vinum-volume. The volumes reside on a atabeast doing the > raid 5. The server is a 5.4 RC2 doing nfs on i386. > > According to some threads gvinum may