2009/7/9 Mike Tancsa
Jul 9 14:34:17 fw02 kernel: ng_ether_attach: can't name node em1.10
> Jul 9 14:34:17 fw02 kernel: ng_ether_attach: can't name node em1.172
> Jul 9 14:34:17 fw02 kernel: ng_ether_attach: can't name node em1.24
>
> Is there some reason this does not work ?
reason - name
2009/7/9 Mike Tancsa
Jul 9 14:34:17 fw02 kernel: ng_ether_attach: can't name node em1.10
> Jul 9 14:34:17 fw02 kernel: ng_ether_attach: can't name node em1.172
> Jul 9 14:34:17 fw02 kernel: ng_ether_attach: can't name node em1.24
>
> Is there some reason this does not work ?
>
reason - interf
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 09:35:40PM +0900, Hideki Yamamoto wrote:
H> > -l switch configures label in ppp.conf
H> > -p swicth configures provider name which is announced in Ethernet.
H>
H> Thank you for your reply.
H> I think comment statement in /etc/defaults/rc.conf should be changed
H> because
Hi,
From: Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: pppoe server option
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 11:12:50 +0300
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 12:34:25AM +0900, Hideki Yamamoto wrote:
> H> I have found a problem about PPPoE parameter in /etc/
On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 12:34:25AM +0900, Hideki Yamamoto wrote:
H> I have found a problem about PPPoE parameter in /etc/rc.network.
H> When setting the following lines in /etc/rc.conf, pppoe server does not
H> work well. The string "service-pppoe" is an entry in
H> /etc/ppp/ppp.conf for PPPoE se
Title: pppoe crashes in 4.3-stable (14.5.2000)
Can you tell me exactly what options you put in
your kernel?
- Original Message -
From:
Bernd Fürwitt
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 12:37
PM
Subject: pppoe crashes in 4.3-stable
(14.5.2000)
user
o anything
but open the possibility that this could be an existing open problem.
- Original Message -
From: "Kris Kennaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bernd Fürwitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "'Kris Kennaway'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMA
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 08:34:43AM +0200, Bernd Fürwitt wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 07:59:26AM +0200, Bernd Fürwitt wrote:
> > > user-mode ppp crashes when calling pppoe-providers.
> > > After starting ppp I get the following error message
> > >
> > > linker_file_sysinit "netgraph.ko" f
Title: RE: pppoe crashes in 4.3-stable (14.5.2000)
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 07:59:26AM +0200, Bernd Fürwitt wrote:
> > user-mode ppp crashes when calling pppoe-providers.
> > After starting ppp I get the following error message
> >
> > linker_file_s
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 07:59:26AM +0200, Bernd Fürwitt wrote:
> user-mode ppp crashes when calling pppoe-providers.
> After starting ppp I get the following error message
>
> linker_file_sysinit "netgraph.ko" failed to register! 17
> Fatal Trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
>
> The kernel
Ted Sikora wrote:
> Recently my cable service
> reduced the bandwidth. Now upstreams average 16k and downstream 400k.
> There has to be something better. Several users on my node (all
> BSD/Linux users) have been enjoying our own little private network with
> speeds up to 900k both ways.(600k ave
Ted Sikora wrote:
>
> Dan Ts'o wrote:
> >
> > > Just FYI, Bell Atlantic (I guess they're now called Verizon) is deploying
> > > the same junk. I mean, PPPoE is *so* wasteful, with THIRTY extra bytes
> > > of overhead per frame (10 bytes of LLC/SNAP header, 14 bytes of Ethernet
> > > header, plus
Dan Ts'o wrote:
>
> > Just FYI, Bell Atlantic (I guess they're now called Verizon) is deploying
> > the same junk. I mean, PPPoE is *so* wasteful, with THIRTY extra bytes
> > of overhead per frame (10 bytes of LLC/SNAP header, 14 bytes of Ethernet
> > header, plus 6 bytes of PPPoE header), compa
Will Mitayai Keeso Rowe wrote:
>
> Ted,
>
> I believe that William was requesting a method to do a net install of
> FreeBSD with PPPoE.
Yeah I know. I emailed him earlier. I posted the FAQ in case anyone was
having trouble with PPPoe. It would be nice to have the option on the
install floppies.
> Just FYI, Bell Atlantic (I guess they're now called Verizon) is deploying
> the same junk. I mean, PPPoE is *so* wasteful, with THIRTY extra bytes
> of overhead per frame (10 bytes of LLC/SNAP header, 14 bytes of Ethernet
> header, plus 6 bytes of PPPoE header), compared to direct PPP over ATM.
Will Mitayai Keeso Rowe wrote:
>
> Ted,
>
> I believe that William was requesting a method to do a net install of
> FreeBSD with PPPoE.
>
> So, having been stuck at one point in this same situation (i live in
> Toronto, Canada, and the xDSL provided by Bell Sympatico uses PPPoE) i
> re-post t
inal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ted Sikora
Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2000 6:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PPPoE
William Wong wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> Does anyone know if there are plans to support PPPoE outta the box?
(without
&
17 matches
Mail list logo
