On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 08:10:49AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:51:07 +0100
> Torfinn Ingolfsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0600
> > ejc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > rtld.c has changed a bit over time so here's a patch against the n
Kai Lockwood <> wrote on Friday, January 26, 2007 5:10 AM:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
>> > > BTW, what is the reason this "hack" isn't included in the base kernel
>> > > / code?
>> >
>> > Because it is probably unnecessary? I run a recent
This is a Firefox specific patch which requires the rtld be patched.
Many thanks to those who have provided patch updates because I was at a
lost without them.
Oliver Fromme wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> > BTW, what is the reason this "hack" isn't included in t
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 19:10, Alexandre Vasconcelos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Working setup:
> - FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE, firefox 2 and flash 7 patched with
> rtld_dlsym_hack.diff, like suggested on Handbook.
>
> After 6.2-STABLE upgrade reaplying the rtld_dlsym_hack.diff fails:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> > BTW, what is the reason this "hack" isn't included in the base kernel
> > / code?
>
> Because it is probably unnecessary? I run a recent 6-STABLE and use
> the flash7 plugin *without* this patch. I am using Opera, though, not
> Firefox
Torfinn Ingolfsen <> wrote on Wednesday, January 24, 2007 10:51 PM:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0600
> ejc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> rtld.c has changed a bit over time so here's a patch against the new
>> file.
>
> BTW, what is the reason this "hack" isn't included in the base kernel
>
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:51:07 +0100
Torfinn Ingolfsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0600
> ejc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > rtld.c has changed a bit over time so here's a patch against the new
> > file.
> BTW, what is the reason this "hack" isn't included in the base k
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 19:10, Alexandre Vasconcelos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Working setup:
> - FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE, firefox 2 and flash 7 patched with
> rtld_dlsym_hack.diff, like suggested on Handbook.
>
> After 6.2-STABLE upgrade reaplying the rtld_dlsym_hack.diff fails:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:11:16 -0600
ejc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rtld.c has changed a bit over time so here's a patch against the new
> file.
BTW, what is the reason this "hack" isn't included in the base kernel /
code?
--
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen,
Norway
__
Tobias Roth wrote:
For your convenience: http://fsck.ch/rtld_dlsym_hack_new.diff
or the attached file (if it makes it through).
Thank you guys, for all responses.
Alex
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:36:06 -0600
"Scot Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/24/07, Alexandre Vasconcelos
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# patch < rtld_dlsym_hack.diff
> > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
> > The text leading up to this was:
> >
On 1/24/07, Alexandre Vasconcelos
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Scot Hetzel wrote:
> Apply the missing patch hunk (vi libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c.rej) to
> libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c.
Thanks for answering Scot, and sorry for ignorance.. how can I do it?
rtld.c has changed a bit over time so here's a p
On 1/24/07, Alexandre Vasconcelos
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Scot Hetzel wrote:
> Apply the missing patch hunk (vi libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c.rej) to
> libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c.
Thanks for answering Scot, and sorry for ignorance.. how can I do it?
Open /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c.rej in one
Scot Hetzel wrote:
Apply the missing patch hunk (vi libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c.rej) to
libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c.
Thanks for answering Scot, and sorry for ignorance.. how can I do it?
Thanks again,
Alex
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http:/
On 1/24/07, Alexandre Vasconcelos
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# patch < rtld_dlsym_hack.diff
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|--- libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c.orig Fri Sep 24 08:04:52 2004
|+++ libexec/rt
15 matches
Mail list logo