Re: Problems with network in jail

2009-01-08 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Spil Oss wrote: Hi Peter, Thanks a lot! Will read up on that. (luckily I do speak german/swiss-german). From discussions on ##FreeBSD IRC I learned that it is not recommended to use lo0 for jails! On FreeBSD-6.3 I succesfully used lo0/127.0.0.2 for my mysql jail that needed to be addressed only

Re: Problems with network in jail

2009-01-08 Thread Oliver Fromme
Spil Oss wrote: > Thanks a lot! Will read up on that. (luckily I do speak > german/swiss-german). From discussions on ##FreeBSD IRC I learned that > it is not recommended to use lo0 for jails! Why would that be not recommended? In fact I think it is a very good idea to use lo0 addresses for j

Re: Problems with network in jail

2009-01-08 Thread Oliver Peter
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 11:07:04 +0100 "Spil Oss" wrote: > Early this week, I upgraded from 7.0 to 7.1 (not having 'used' jails > on 7.0). After creating the jail with > `ezjail-admin update -i` > I created a 'ports build' jail > `ezjail-admin create build 127.0.0.3` > and forgot to add the alias

Re: Problems with network in jail

2009-01-08 Thread Spil Oss
Hi Peter, Thanks a lot! Will read up on that. (luckily I do speak german/swiss-german). From discussions on ##FreeBSD IRC I learned that it is not recommended to use lo0 for jails! On FreeBSD-6.3 I succesfully used lo0/127.0.0.2 for my mysql jail that needed to be addressed only locally, but ONLY

Problems with network in jail

2009-01-08 Thread Spil Oss
Hi all, Is it mandatory to add device mem to jails to enable network via the gateway? Left ezjail with FreeBSD-6.3 (and a hardware replacement of my server) and am now starting again with FreeBSD-7.1. Early this week, I upgraded from 7.0 to 7.1 (not having 'used' jails on 7.0). After creating th