Spil Oss wrote:
Hi Peter,
Thanks a lot! Will read up on that. (luckily I do speak
german/swiss-german). From discussions on ##FreeBSD IRC I learned that
it is not recommended to use lo0 for jails!
On FreeBSD-6.3 I succesfully used lo0/127.0.0.2 for my mysql jail that
needed to be addressed only
Spil Oss wrote:
> Thanks a lot! Will read up on that. (luckily I do speak
> german/swiss-german). From discussions on ##FreeBSD IRC I learned that
> it is not recommended to use lo0 for jails!
Why would that be not recommended?
In fact I think it is a very good idea to use lo0 addresses
for j
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 11:07:04 +0100
"Spil Oss" wrote:
> Early this week, I upgraded from 7.0 to 7.1 (not having 'used' jails
> on 7.0). After creating the jail with
> `ezjail-admin update -i`
> I created a 'ports build' jail
> `ezjail-admin create build 127.0.0.3`
> and forgot to add the alias
Hi Peter,
Thanks a lot! Will read up on that. (luckily I do speak
german/swiss-german). From discussions on ##FreeBSD IRC I learned that
it is not recommended to use lo0 for jails!
On FreeBSD-6.3 I succesfully used lo0/127.0.0.2 for my mysql jail that
needed to be addressed only locally, but ONLY
Hi all,
Is it mandatory to add device mem to jails to enable network via the gateway?
Left ezjail with FreeBSD-6.3 (and a hardware replacement of my server)
and am now starting again with FreeBSD-7.1.
Early this week, I upgraded from 7.0 to 7.1 (not having 'used' jails
on 7.0). After creating th