In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Damian Gerow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Thus spake Alex Dupre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [11/03/06 22:18]:
: : > This problem has been discussed many times on the lists. In order to
: : > update devfs you can use:
: : >
: : > cat /dev/null > /dev/daX
: : >
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 08:33:31AM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 01:32:01AM +0100, Alex Dupre wrote:
> > Robert Marella wrote:
> > > This problem has been discussed many times on the lists. In order to
> > > update devfs you can use:
> > >
> > > cat /dev/null > /dev/daX
>
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 01:32:01AM +0100, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Robert Marella wrote:
> > This problem has been discussed many times on the lists. In order to
> > update devfs you can use:
> >
> > cat /dev/null > /dev/daX
> >
> > I seem to remember another method using dd.
> >
> > I hope this help
.. Original Message ...
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 16:24:21 -0700 (MST) "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Robert Marella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>: On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 13:51:30 +0100
>: Alex Dupre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>:
>: > My n
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 01:32:01 +0100
Alex Dupre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Marella wrote:
> > This problem has been discussed many times on the lists. In order to
> > update devfs you can use:
> >
> > cat /dev/null > /dev/daX
> >
> > I seem to remember another method using dd.
> >
> > I
Thus spake Alex Dupre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [11/03/06 22:18]:
: > This problem has been discussed many times on the lists. In order to
: > update devfs you can use:
: >
: > cat /dev/null > /dev/daX
: >
: > I seem to remember another method using dd.
: >
: > I hope this helps.
:
: The 'cat' way wo
Robert Marella wrote:
> This problem has been discussed many times on the lists. In order to
> update devfs you can use:
>
> cat /dev/null > /dev/daX
>
> I seem to remember another method using dd.
>
> I hope this helps.
The 'cat' way works, thanks. Perhaps we should add this info somewhere
in
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Robert Marella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 13:51:30 +0100
: Alex Dupre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:
: > My new PC has an internal 16-in-1 card reader connected via USB 2.0.
: > The device is the Techsolo TCR-1640
: > (http://www.tec
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 13:51:30 +0100
Alex Dupre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My new PC has an internal 16-in-1 card reader connected via USB 2.0.
> The device is the Techsolo TCR-1640
> (http://www.techsolo.de/product/cardreader/tcr_1640/index.php).
> I boot from a compact flash inserted in it and I
Benjamin Lutz wrote:
> Did you try to unplug the whole card reader, inserting the new CF card an
> then
> plugging it back into an USB port? It's /dev/da* entries should disappear
> once it's unplugged, and be newly created when it's reconnected.
Errr, there is a problem: the card reader is *in
Hi Alex,
> My new PC has an internal 16-in-1 card reader connected via USB 2.0. The
> device is the Techsolo TCR-1640
> (http://www.techsolo.de/product/cardreader/tcr_1640/index.php).
> I boot from a compact flash inserted in it and I can mount and unmount
> the same CF once the system has booted
My new PC has an internal 16-in-1 card reader connected via USB 2.0. The
device is the Techsolo TCR-1640
(http://www.techsolo.de/product/cardreader/tcr_1640/index.php).
I boot from a compact flash inserted in it and I can mount and unmount
the same CF once the system has booted and has mounted the
12 matches
Mail list logo
