The point of MFC'ing cpio(1) changes is that it has fixed some old bugs
that can potentially damage user data.
Personally I'd rather replace it with the BSD pax(1) found in the base
system, if we had a proper GNU cpio(1) test suite to make sure that we
did not break something. It might be interes
A few minutes ago I was extracting information about mass copying with
pax(1) & cpio(1L) on 6.2-PRERELEASE. I got information from pax(1)
man page, but i found cpio(1L) man page to be rather lacking. (Yeah,
I saw the pointer to info.)
Is it possible to have a genuine cpio(1L) 2.6 man page availa
