> -Original Message-
> From: David O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 04:53:24PM -, Alan Jay wrote:
> > I had major problems installing with more than 4Gb but once I moved to
> stable
> > we seemed to have a stable platform when doing basic stuff - we have tw
I concur that the situation got much better with 5.3-Stable. What I
experienced afterward occurred only under load.
-Jonathan
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Alan Jay wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 04:53:24PM -, Alan Jay wrote:
> > > I had major problems installing w
> -Original Message-
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 04:53:24PM -, Alan Jay wrote:
> > I had major problems installing with more than 4Gb but once I moved to
> stable
> > we seemed to have a stable platform when doing basic stuff - we have two
> > databases (mySQL) one is reasonably heavily u
[ PLEASE don't top post - it losses context, and this is a Unix mailing list]
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 04:53:24PM -, Alan Jay wrote:
> I had major problems installing with more than 4Gb but once I moved to stable
> we seemed to have a stable platform when doing basic stuff - we have two
> datab
>
> The >4GB problems with 5.3-RELEASE are a well known problem and affect
> for i386 and amd64. It's pretty much fixed in the 5.3-STABLE stream,
> but there are a few edge cases that I still need to fix which prevent me
> from feeling good about turning it into a 5.3-R errata fix. It'll
> defin
Alan Jay wrote:
Thanks Jonathan for this, can I ask the unmentionalble (which Linux
implementation did you pick?).
I had major problems installing with more than 4Gb but once I moved to stable
we seemed to have a stable platform when doing basic stuff - we have two
databases (mySQL) one is reasonab
ble@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Possible problems with Broadcom BCM5704C 10/100/1000 on Tyan
> Motherboard
>
> We also have these boards, I've found them unusable under
> FreeBSD/5.3-STABLE with 8GB of RAM--other qualities appear to work okay.
> But I even
nday, February 14, 2005 6:16 PM
> To: Alan Jay
> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Possible problems with Broadcom BCM5704C 10/100/1000 on Tyan
> Motherboard
>
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Alan Jay wrote:
>
> > I have FreeBSD 5.3 STABLE onto our new twin operteron T
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 05:47:27PM -0800, Jonathan A. Dama wrote:
> FreeBSD/amd64 is not in my opinion not actually a stable tier 1 quality
> release under these configurations, too many problems remain--especially
> in regards to ia32 emulation.
It is not required for a Tier-1 platform to have 32
We also have these boards, I've found them unusable under
FreeBSD/5.3-STABLE with 8GB of RAM--other qualities appear to work okay.
But I even saw some infrequent problems with 6GB.
FreeBSD/amd64 is not in my opinion not actually a stable tier 1 quality
release under these configurations, too many
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Alan Jay wrote:
> I have FreeBSD 5.3 STABLE onto our new twin operteron Tyan Thunder K8S Pro
> S2882 with 8Gb of RAM and had a reasonably stable operation for a few days we
> installed a couple of databases one worked fine but the other kept on causing
> the server to crash.
Hi,
I have FreeBSD 5.3 STABLE onto our new twin operteron Tyan Thunder K8S Pro
S2882 with 8Gb of RAM and had a reasonably stable operation for a few days we
installed a couple of databases one worked fine but the other kept on causing
the server to crash.
I have searched the archive and there
12 matches
Mail list logo
