On Sunday, 26. June 2005 01:18, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> If there was significant "product differentiation" between xfree86 and
> xorg, then there would be a reason to keep both. Right now there is
> not and with the difficulty in X development, there won't soon be.
There's already quite a delta
>-Original Message-
>From: Mark Linimon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 3:51 PM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Mark Linimon; Daniel O'Connor; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Warren;
>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: Portupgrade in
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 02:45:45PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> I'm sorry to step on the toes of the port maintainer but instead
> of complaining about it you need to respond to the realitites.
In general I would rather do that than argue, yes.
> make: don't know how to make /drm.h. Stop
> **
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 7:45 am, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> But the plain fact of the matter is that the Open Source community
> isn't going to tolerate what xfree86 tried doing, and the users of
> open source, which is you and I, are not served by splitting development
> between 2 forks of X Windows.
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Linimon
>Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 11:25 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Daniel O'Connor; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Warren;
>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: R
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 09:14:26AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> Why are you building xfree86? FreeBSD 5.4 uses Xorg. It's
> just about the same code just different licensing. I don't think the
> FreeBSD core is bothering to keep the xfree86 port working on FreeBSD 5.X
> just FreeBSD 4.11
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Warren
>Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 4:17 AM
>To: Daniel O'Connor
>Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed
>
>
>On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 9:11 pm, Daniel
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:47, Warren wrote:
> Just before doing PortUpgrade before sending the 1st email
>
> > Did you read /usr/ports/UPDATING?
>
> cant say as i did.
Well that was silly..
Not that I think there is a specific entry in this case but it is a good habit
to get in to..
Do you have the
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 9:11 pm, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:35, Warren wrote:
> > ln
> > -s
> > /usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-su
> >pp ort/linux/drm/xf86drmRandom.c xf86drmRandom.c
> > rm -f xf86drmSL.c
> > ln
> > -s
> > /usr/ports/graphics/
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:35, Warren wrote:
> ln
> -s
> /usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-supp
>ort/linux/drm/xf86drmRandom.c xf86drmRandom.c
> rm -f xf86drmSL.c
> ln
> -s
> /usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-supp
>ort/linux/drm/
ln
-s
/usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/xf86drmRandom.c
xf86drmRandom.c
rm -f xf86drmSL.c
ln
-s
/usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/xf86drmSL.c
xf86drmSL.c
make: don't know how to mak
11 matches
Mail list logo
