Re: Ports and WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS

2013-02-05 Thread Andreas Nilsson
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > 05.02.2013 15:06, Andreas Nilsson: > > Ah, sorry for being unclear. I meant which config files :) >> > > I'm using ports-mgmt/portconf to keep track of all knobs. > > > -- > Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow. > Thanks. I'll look into

Re: Ports and WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS

2013-02-05 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko
05.02.2013 15:06, Andreas Nilsson: Ah, sorry for being unclear. I meant which config files :) I'm using ports-mgmt/portconf to keep track of all knobs. -- Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.

Re: Ports and WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS

2013-02-05 Thread Andreas Nilsson
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > 05.02.2013 13:59, Andreas Nilsson: > > > Thanks for trying this out. Is there also a list of ports that >> *do* >> compile (and hopefully run) successfully? :-) >> >> >> I already switched to libc++ on my unstable ST

Re: Ports and WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS

2013-02-05 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko
05.02.2013 13:59, Andreas Nilsson: Thanks for trying this out. Is there also a list of ports that *do* compile (and hopefully run) successfully? :-) I already switched to libc++ on my unstable STABLE-9 machines. Currently I'm using this config: *: CXXFLAGS= -stdli

Re: Ports and WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS

2013-02-05 Thread Andreas Nilsson
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > 03.02.2013 15:28, Dimitry Andric: > > Thanks for trying this out. Is there also a list of ports that *do* >> compile (and hopefully run) successfully? :-) >> > > I already switched to libc++ on my unstable STABLE-9 machines. Currently >

Re: Ports and WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS

2013-02-04 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko
03.02.2013 15:28, Dimitry Andric: Thanks for trying this out. Is there also a list of ports that *do* compile (and hopefully run) successfully? :-) I already switched to libc++ on my unstable STABLE-9 machines. Currently I'm using this config: *: CXXFLAGS= -stdlib=libc++ -std=c++11 | LDFLAG

Re: Ports and WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS

2013-02-03 Thread Andreas Nilsson
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2013-02-03 14:56, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> > ... > > This is as yet an unsolved problem, as LDFLAGS is the same for both C >>> and C++ link jobs. I think the easiest way would

Re: Ports and WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS

2013-02-03 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2013-02-03 14:56, Andreas Nilsson wrote: On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: ... This is as yet an unsolved problem, as LDFLAGS is the same for both C and C++ link jobs. I think the easiest way would be to set your CXX variable to: CXX=cc -stdlib=libc++ Wouldn't CXX=CC

Re: Ports and WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS

2013-02-03 Thread Andreas Nilsson
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2013-02-03 11:39, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > >> I wanted to try the new c++ stuff, ie clang-3.2, libc++ and libcxxrt, so I >> used poudriere to build a jail setup for that ( WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS=yes in >> src.conf, CXXFLAGS+=-stdlib=libc++ and

Re: Ports and WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS

2013-02-03 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2013-02-03 11:39, Andreas Nilsson wrote: I wanted to try the new c++ stuff, ie clang-3.2, libc++ and libcxxrt, so I used poudriere to build a jail setup for that ( WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS=yes in src.conf, CXXFLAGS+=-stdlib=libc++ and libsupc++.so.1 libcxxrt.so.1 in libmap.conf ), and started to bui