Re: Pack of CAM improvements

2010-01-24 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:48:15 +0200 Alexander Motin wrote: > Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > I started seeing a problem a few days ago with one of my DVD drives (a > > burner at cd0) under 9-current, which makes it impossible to use it even > > to simply read a DVD. > > > > Here the (rather strange IMO

Re: Pack of CAM improvements

2010-01-24 Thread Alexander Motin
Gary Jennejohn wrote: > I started seeing a problem a few days ago with one of my DVD drives (a > burner at cd0) under 9-current, which makes it impossible to use it even > to simply read a DVD. > > Here the (rather strange IMO) output in dmesg: > > cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device > cd0: 66.7

Re: Pack of CAM improvements

2010-01-23 Thread Yamagi Burmeister
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Alexander Motin wrote: Hi. I've made a patch, that should solve set of problems of CAM ATA and CAM generally. I would like to ask for testing and feedback. [snip] Hello, applied this patch to 8-stable recompiled the kernel and rebooted. The kernel did not boot it hangs w

Re: Pack of CAM improvements

2010-01-23 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:07:47 +0100 (CET) Juergen Lock wrote: > But what > this still doesn't fix is the broken `test unit ready' command on ada > devices, which also makes things like `cdrecord -scanbus' hang the bus. :( > (A few days ago I also got a hang after wanting to try out xfburn, > I sus

Re: Pack of CAM improvements

2010-01-23 Thread Juergen Lock
In article <4b55d9d4.1000...@freebsd.org> you write: >Hi. Hi! > >I've made a patch, that should solve set of problems of CAM ATA and CAM >generally. I would like to ask for testing and feedback. > >What patch does: >- It unifies bus reset/probe sequence. Whenever bus attached at boot or >later, CAM

Re: Pack of CAM improvements

2010-01-22 Thread Olivier Smedts
2010/1/22 Harald Schmalzbauer : > Alexander Motin schrieb am 19.01.2010 17:12 (localtime): > ... >> >> Patch can be found here: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/cam-ata.20100119.patch >> >> Feedback as always welcome. > > Again, thanks a lot for your ongoing great work! > The patch doesn't cleanly

Re: Pack of CAM improvements

2010-01-22 Thread Freddie Cash
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Steve Polyack wrote: > On 01/22/10 11:48, Freddie Cash wrote: > >> In my testing of pulling drives at random (using a 3Ware 9550SXU or 9650SE >>> >>> >> controller), you have to "zpool offline " while the drive >> is >> unplugged, before you can re-insert the sa

Re: Pack of CAM improvements

2010-01-22 Thread Steve Polyack
On 01/22/10 11:48, Freddie Cash wrote: On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer< h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de> wrote: Alexander Motin schrieb am 19.01.2010 17:12 (localtime): ... Patch can be found here: http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/cam-ata.20100119.patch Feedback as

Re: Pack of CAM improvements

2010-01-22 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:23:55AM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > But I had some questions about zfs raidz states. I think that isn't > a matter of atacam but if I removed one disk, zpool status still > showed me the ada3 device "online". > After reinserting (and proper detection/initialisazio

Re: Pack of CAM improvements

2010-01-22 Thread Freddie Cash
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer < h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de> wrote: > Alexander Motin schrieb am 19.01.2010 17:12 (localtime): > ... > > Patch can be found here: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/cam-ata.20100119.patch >> >> Feedback as always welcome. >> > > Again, thanks a

Re: Pack of CAM improvements

2010-01-22 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Alexander Motin schrieb am 19.01.2010 17:12 (localtime): ... Patch can be found here: http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/cam-ata.20100119.patch Feedback as always welcome. Again, thanks a lot for your ongoing great work! The patch doesn't cleanly apply with vpo, but I don't use vpo so I didn't ca

Re: Pack of CAM improvements

2010-01-21 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:34:07 +0100 Henri Hennebert wrote: > On 01/19/2010 17:12, Alexander Motin wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I've made a patch, that should solve set of problems of CAM ATA and CAM Thanks! > > generally. I would like to ask for testing and feedback. > > > > What patch does: > > - It un

Re: Pack of CAM improvements

2010-01-20 Thread Henri Hennebert
On 01/19/2010 17:12, Alexander Motin wrote: Hi. I've made a patch, that should solve set of problems of CAM ATA and CAM generally. I would like to ask for testing and feedback. What patch does: - It unifies bus reset/probe sequence. Whenever bus attached at boot or later, CAM will automatically

Re: Pack of CAM improvements

2010-01-19 Thread Alexander Motin
Scott Long wrote: > On Jan 19, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Alexander Motin wrote: >> I've made a patch, that should solve set of problems of CAM ATA and CAM >> generally. I would like to ask for testing and feedback. >> >> What patch does: >> - It unifies bus reset/probe sequence. Whenever bus attached at bo

Re: Pack of CAM improvements

2010-01-19 Thread Scott Long
On Jan 19, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Alexander Motin wrote: Hi. I've made a patch, that should solve set of problems of CAM ATA and CAM generally. I would like to ask for testing and feedback. What patch does: - It unifies bus reset/probe sequence. Whenever bus attached at boot or later, CAM wi

Pack of CAM improvements

2010-01-19 Thread Alexander Motin
Hi. I've made a patch, that should solve set of problems of CAM ATA and CAM generally. I would like to ask for testing and feedback. What patch does: - It unifies bus reset/probe sequence. Whenever bus attached at boot or later, CAM will automatically reset and scan it. It allows to remove duplic