In the last episode (May 12), Scott Long said:
> Daniel Eischen wrote:
> >On Wed, 11 May 2005, Jonathan Noack wrote:
> >>I checked out _PTHREADS_INVARIANTS for libthr and libpthread on CURRENT.
> >> As far as I can tell, all but one of the defines under
> >>_PTHREADS_INVARIANTS are ASSERTs; they ch
Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2005, Jonathan Noack wrote:
I checked out _PTHREADS_INVARIANTS for libthr and libpthread on CURRENT.
As far as I can tell, all but one of the defines under
_PTHREADS_INVARIANTS are ASSERTs; they check for a condition and if it
is false result in a fatal error.
On 05/11/05 21:53, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2005, Jonathan Noack wrote:
I checked out _PTHREADS_INVARIANTS for libthr and libpthread on CURRENT.
As far as I can tell, all but one of the defines under
_PTHREADS_INVARIANTS are ASSERTs; they check for a condition and if it
is false result
On Wed, 11 May 2005, Jonathan Noack wrote:
>
> I checked out _PTHREADS_INVARIANTS for libthr and libpthread on CURRENT.
> As far as I can tell, all but one of the defines under
> _PTHREADS_INVARIANTS are ASSERTs; they check for a condition and if it
> is false result in a fatal error. These shou
On 05/11/05 09:55, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
= > As we were counting down to 5.3-RELEASE, I noticed, that all
= > threading libraries still compile with PTHREAD_INVARIANTS. My
= > suggestion to have this = > fixed was shutdown as not enough time
= > was left
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> = > As we were counting down to 5.3-RELEASE, I noticed, that all
> = > threading libraries still compile with PTHREAD_INVARIANTS. My
> = > suggestion to have this = > fixed was shutdown as not enough time
> = > was left for testing the 5.3.
>
> = > Can
= > As we were counting down to 5.3-RELEASE, I noticed, that all
= > threading libraries still compile with PTHREAD_INVARIANTS. My
= > suggestion to have this = > fixed was shutdown as not enough time
= > was left for testing the 5.3.
= > Can we have these things turned off NOW, so that, at least,
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> As we were counting down to 5.3-RELEASE, I noticed, that all threading
> libraries still compile with PTHREAD_INVARIANTS. My suggestion to have this
> fixed was shutdown as not enough time was left for testing the 5.3.
>
> 6 months later the
Hello!
As we were counting down to 5.3-RELEASE, I noticed, that all threading
libraries still compile with PTHREAD_INVARIANTS. My suggestion to have this
fixed was shutdown as not enough time was left for testing the 5.3.
6 months later the much anticipated 5.4 ships with these defines again an
