Re: Panic: Out of mbuf clusters

1999-12-31 Thread Mr. K.
On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Mike Smith wrote: > > OK, so I raised NMBCLUSTERS to 4096, and installed a second freebsd-stable > > box also with NMBCLUSTERS at 4096, and I managed to have them both panic > > at the same time (unfortunately, only one of them gave me a crash dump). > > But anyway, here is t

Re: Panic: Out of mbuf clusters

1999-12-30 Thread Mike Smith
> OK, so I raised NMBCLUSTERS to 4096, and installed a second freebsd-stable > box also with NMBCLUSTERS at 4096, and I managed to have them both panic > at the same time (unfortunately, only one of them gave me a crash dump). > But anyway, here is the stack trace, hopefully someone can tell me if

Re: Out of mbuf clusters

1999-09-21 Thread Kip Macy
You are, as is so often the case, correct. The way you phrase your responses sometimes blinds me, and evidently others, to the complete circumstances. -Kip On 21 Sep 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Kip Macy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > This is in no way a

Re: Out of mbuf clusters

1999-09-20 Thread Wes Peters
ich results in your server rolling over and dying one way or another. > Yes, some of those steps were necessary (most importantly, the > one you outline below), but not all of them. Right up until somebody launches a clone attack against you... (this is getting monotonous, isn't i