"Antoine Beaupre (LMC)" wrote:
>
> ...
> Ah! Heard that before! What's your IP again? ;)
Well, now, that's a secret, you hear.
But that would be proving a point. That's something different ;). That
has once been done in 1997. Because I was too lazy to reboot the box
to load the new kernel befo
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 03:56:55AM +0200, Roelof Osinga wrote:
> "Alexey V. Neyman" wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Not only that, even 3.5.1-RELEASE fails to compile world for RELENG_4.
> > What about staying insecure for a few hours of make world on 4.2-RELEASE,
> > if this worries you, you may tur
Wed, May 16, 2001 at 01:41:55, ab (Eugene M. Kim) wrote about "Old compiler
(3.3-stable -> 4->stable)":
> I'm having some hard time getting a machine upgraded from 3.3-stable to
> 4-stable.
It is better now to do binary upgrade from 3.x to 4.3, if your Internet
co
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 9:14 PM
Subject: Re: Old compiler (3.3-stable -> 4->stable)
> Erik Trulsson wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 01:41:55AM +0900, Eugene M. Kim wrote:
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > I'm hav
Erik Trulsson wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 01:41:55AM +0900, Eugene M. Kim wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I'm having some hard time getting a machine upgraded from 3.3-stable to
> > 4-stable.
> > ...
>
> You will probably have to do the upgrade in several steps:
> First upgrade to 3.5-STABL
