Re: No buffer space available / tcp_inpcb value

2012-10-30 Thread Alfred Perlstein
How much memory is in this machine? maxsockets is in turn clipped by "nmbclusters" which is in turn clipped by "maxusers" which is limited to 384 MAXIMUM unless you're running -CURRENT. On 10/30/12 10:05 AM, Navdeep Parhar wrote: On 10/30/12 06:21, Adam Strohl wrote: Hey -STABLE, I've

Re: No buffer space available / tcp_inpcb value

2012-10-30 Thread Navdeep Parhar
On 10/30/12 06:21, Adam Strohl wrote: Hey -STABLE, I've got a client who we've setup a FreeBSD cluster for with about a dozens servers, all behind two front end proxies/LBs/firewalls which also act as NAT gateways for the internal servers. On the active front end proxy we've started seeing "fat

Re: No buffer space available / tcp_inpcb value

2012-10-30 Thread Adam Strohl
On 10/30/2012 23:05, Adrian Chadd wrote: Check the output of 'netstat -mb', maybe you're also running out of mbufs? There was nothing denied there that I can see: 35696/4039/39735 mbufs in use (current/cache/total) 2069/3797/5866/32768 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 2069/2077 m

Re: No buffer space available / tcp_inpcb value

2012-10-30 Thread Adrian Chadd
Check the output of 'netstat -mb', maybe you're also running out of mbufs? Adrian On 30 October 2012 06:21, Adam Strohl wrote: > Hey -STABLE, > > I've got a client who we've setup a FreeBSD cluster for with about a dozens > servers, all behind two front end proxies/LBs/firewalls which also ac

No buffer space available / tcp_inpcb value

2012-10-30 Thread Adam Strohl
Hey -STABLE, I've got a client who we've setup a FreeBSD cluster for with about a dozens servers, all behind two front end proxies/LBs/firewalls which also act as NAT gateways for the internal servers. On the active front end proxy we've started seeing "fatal: socket: No buffer space availab