Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE: Kernel Panic

2010-12-29 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
On Wednesday, 29 December 2010, jhell wrote: > > Another note too, I think I read that you mentioned using the L2ARC and > slog device on the same disk You simply shouldn't do this it could > be contributing to the real cause and there is absolutely no gain in > either sanity or performance a

Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE: Kernel Panic

2010-12-28 Thread jhell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/28/2010 18:20, Martin Matuska wrote: > Please don't consider these patches as production-ready. > What we want to do is find and resolve as many bugs as possible. I completely agree with Martin here. If your running it then your willing to loose

Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE: Kernel Panic

2010-12-28 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
Hi On Wednesday, 29 December 2010, Martin Matuska wrote: > Please don't consider these patches as production-ready. > What we want to do is find and resolve as many bugs as possible. > > To help us fix these bugs, a way to reproduce the bug from a clean start > (e.g. in virtualbox) would be great

Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE: Kernel Panic

2010-12-28 Thread Martin Matuska
Please don't consider these patches as production-ready. What we want to do is find and resolve as many bugs as possible. To help us fix these bugs, a way to reproduce the bug from a clean start (e.g. in virtualbox) would be great and speed up finding the cause for the problem. Your problem looks

Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE: Kernel Panic

2010-12-28 Thread Freddie Cash
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Jean-Yves Avenard > Now, I haven't tried using cache and log from a different disk. The > motherboard on the server has 8 SATA ports, and I have no free port to > add another disk. So my only option to have both a log and cache > device in my zfs pool, is to use two

Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE: Kernel Panic

2010-12-28 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
On 29 December 2010 03:15, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: > # zpool import > load: 0.00  cmd: zpool 405 [spa_namespace_lock] 15.11r 0.00u 0.03s 0% 2556k > load: 0.00  cmd: zpool 405 [spa_namespace_lock] 15.94r 0.00u 0.03s 0% 2556k > load: 0.00  cmd: zpool 405 [spa_namespace_lock] 16.57r 0.00u 0.03s 0%

Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE: Kernel Panic

2010-12-28 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
Hi On 27 December 2010 16:04, jhell wrote: > 1) Set vfs.zfs.recover=1 at the loader prompt (OK set vfs.zfs.recover=1) > 2) Boot into single user mode without opensolaris.ko and zfs.ko loaded > 3) ( mount -w / ) to make sure you can remove and also write new > zpool.cache as needed. > 3) Remove /

Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE: Kernel Panic

2010-12-26 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
Hi On 27 December 2010 16:04, jhell wrote: > > Before anything else can you: (in FreeBSD) > > 1) Set vfs.zfs.recover=1 at the loader prompt (OK set vfs.zfs.recover=1) > 2) Boot into single user mode without opensolaris.ko and zfs.ko loaded > 3) ( mount -w / ) to make sure you can remove and also

Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE: Kernel Panic

2010-12-26 Thread jhell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/26/2010 23:17, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: > Responding to myself again :P > > On 27 December 2010 13:28, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: >> tried to force a zpool import >> >> got a kernel panic: >> panic: solaris assert: weight >= space && weight <= 2

Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE: Kernel Panic

2010-12-26 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
Responding to myself again :P On 27 December 2010 13:28, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: > tried to force a zpool import > > got a kernel panic: > panic: solaris assert: weight >= space && weight <= 2 * space, file: > /usr/src/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/metaslab.c,

Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE: Kernel Panic

2010-12-26 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
tried to force a zpool import got a kernel panic: panic: solaris assert: weight >= space && weight <= 2 * space, file: /usr/src/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/metaslab.c, line: 793 cpuid = 5 KDB: stack backtrace #0: 0xff805f64be at kdb_backtrace #1 .. pa