On 2004.01.24 19:14 Bill Woods wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, Cordula's Web wrote:
>
> And this has what do do with FreeBSD Stable ?
>
It's simply a notification that I will be distributing some of my original works under
this license. Since FreeBSD is the mainstay operating system for me and m
Hi guys,
First, someone who sends the same email to at least four mailing lists
(freebsd, wine-devel, postgresql-hackers and ossi) is a spammer in my
book. Replying to his email, especially to lists that are not relevant
(i.e. - any but ossi) is helping him along.
To answer his (asked) questio
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, Cordula's Web wrote:
And this has what do do with FreeBSD Stable ?
> [This is OT for stable@ and wine-devel@, but let's contribute anyway...]
>
> > # Users have freely available access to source code, documentation just like the
> > GPL.
>
> Access to source coce, document
[This is OT for stable@ and wine-devel@, but let's contribute anyway...]
> # Users have freely available access to source code, documentation just like the GPL.
Access to source coce, documentation etc... is also possible under the
BSD license. Under the [L]GPL, it is mandatory.
> # Users may us
Richard Schilling wrote:
I would like to present to you all a new Open Source software license I've written up.
[ ... ]
One the face of it, Section III, "Distribution Restrictions and Obligations."
of your license fails to comply with OSD #1 & 2:
"1. Free Redistribution
The license shall not re
I would like to present to you all a new Open Source software license I've written up.
It's called the Single Supplier Open Source License. I will be distributing software
under this license as well as the traditional Open Source licenses found at
opensource.org.
You can see a copy of the lic
