> CARP can let you failover an IP address and ggated provides remote
> access to a physical disk device but the combination will not give you
> a fault tolerant server. One major problem is that you will lose the
> content of the cache when a system fails - this amounts to roughly the
> last 30 se
On Tue, 2006-Apr-11 13:15:48 +0200, Michael Schuh wrote:
>> You probably can't replace defective hardware so fast that the users
>> don't notice. They will probably also notice when a system crash
>> garbles the filesystem.
>
>that was the reason why i would make a mirrored system with CARP
>and g
> You probably can't replace defective hardware so fast that the users
> don't notice. They will probably also notice when a system crash
> garbles the filesystem.
that was the reason why i would make a mirrored system with CARP
and ggated...
>
> Based on your comments of low cost and massiv
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Jeremy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael Schuh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: Needs suggestion for redundant Storage
On Mon, 2006-Apr-10 14:11:46 +0200, Michael Sch
On Mon, 2006-Apr-10 14:11:46 +0200, Michael Schuh wrote:
>so that i have sign a Solution with cheap HW, ok this cheap HW is not very
>stable and never so performant like the right Hardware, but if i use
>this solution,
>so i can relative fast replace defect items with new HW.
You probably can't re
Hello Chuck,
Hello @all,
2006/4/7, Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Michael Schuh wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > i need suggestions and hints about an redundant
> > storage-system.
> >
> > My requirements are:
> > a Storage that is available via Network, flexible in scalation,
> > and must be
Michael Schuh wrote:
Hi everyone,
i need suggestions and hints about an redundant
storage-system.
My requirements are:
a Storage that is available via Network, flexible in scalation,
and must be redundant, and cheap if possible
My Own suggestion was this scenario:
2 boxes very cheap for
Hi everyone,
i need suggestions and hints about an redundant
storage-system.
My requirements are:
a Storage that is available via Network, flexible in scalation,
and must be redundant, and cheap if possible
My Own suggestion was this scenario:
2 boxes very cheap for ~300$
2 or more SATA-II
