Tony Byrne wrote:
Hello Doug,
Friday, January 14, 2005, 1:35:16 AM, you wrote:
DW> scottl has been able to reproduce this on a U320 controller he has. I only
DW> have U160 equipment and can't get the txn rate up high enough to reproduce
DW> the issue. The driver needs KTR instrumentation so we can
Hello Doug,
DW> scottl has been able to reproduce this on a U320 controller he has.
Scott,
We want to take this box into the lab as soon as we have a
replacement for it, but we could do with knowing the best way to
generate the problem on demand. So far the amr driver only seems
to wedge for us
Hello Doug,
Friday, January 14, 2005, 1:35:16 AM, you wrote:
DW> scottl has been able to reproduce this on a U320 controller he has. I only
DW> have U160 equipment and can't get the txn rate up high enough to reproduce
DW> the issue. The driver needs KTR instrumentation so we can see where the
D
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Tony Byrne wrote:
> Basically, after some amount of uptime the kernel will emit a "amr0:
> Bad slot x completed" message and pretty soon after this the box goes into a
> partially unresponsive state forcing us to reboot it. So far the only
> thing triggering the problem is th
Tony Byrne writes:
| Basically, after some amount of uptime the kernel will emit a "amr0:
| Bad slot x completed" message and pretty soon after this the box goes into a
| partially unresponsive state forcing us to reboot it. So far the only
| thing triggering the problem is the nightly jobs, where
Folks,
I kicked off a thread just before the holidays regarding some problems
we are having with an Intel SRCU42X RAID controller in a dual
processor production server originally under 5.3-STABLE and now
under 4.10-STABLE. The thread ran out of steam, with no resolution to
the problem, but I'm ho
Hello Scott,
Wednesday, December 29, 2004, 2:46:04 PM, you wrote:
SL> I've been seeing this problem recently too. I believe that there is
SL> some sort of timing bug/race in the driver, but I haven't been able to
SL> figure it out yet. It also seems to be related to panic from the block
SL> lay
Tony Byrne wrote:
Folks,
We have a 4.10-STABLE production server which has an Intel SRCU42X
RAID controller installed:
amr0: mem 0xfe58-0xfe5f,0xfbef-0xfbef irq
22 at device 0.0 on pci4
amr0: Firmware 411M, BIOS H404,
128MB RAM
The server crashed yesterday in the small hours of
On Dec 29, 2004, at 12:18, Tony Byrne wrote:
The amr driver man page says that this message is indicative of a
firmware or
hardware problem with the controller, but we are not convinced. We
experienced the same message and lockups daily during stress testing
of the
box under FreeBSD 5.3 and this
Folks,
We have a 4.10-STABLE production server which has an Intel SRCU42X
RAID controller installed:
amr0: mem 0xfe58-0xfe5f,0xfbef-0xfbef irq
22 at device 0.0 on pci4
amr0: Firmware 411M, BIOS H404,
128MB RAM
The server crashed yesterday in the small hours of the morning and
10 matches
Mail list logo
