On 4/17/07, Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:30:48AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Acknowledge... I can do better than that, I have a fix for this problem, and
> its not temporary. Here is the code change (not a patch, I'm very busy),
> its in hardwa
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:30:48AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Acknowledge... I can do better than that, I have a fix for this problem, and
> its not temporary. Here is the code change (not a patch, I'm very busy),
> its in hardware_init, should be obvious how to patch:
>
>/* Make s
Hi Jack,
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 02:35:17PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> saying its known to be a problem doesnt mean its cause is known :)
> They discovered that setting this eliminated the problem, but we
> immediately pointed out that this is, as you pointed out, a Bad
> Thing on other hardwa
On 1/23/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey Gleb,
Acknowledge... I can do better than that, I have a fix for this problem, and
its not temporary. Here is the code change (not a patch, I'm very busy),
its in hardware_init, should be obvious how to patch:
/* Make sure we have a
On 1/24/07, Gavin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 10:30 -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 1/22/07, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jack,
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 02:35:17PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > J> >> Since this was just seen, and the patch below
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 10:30 -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 1/22/07, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jack,
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 02:35:17PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > J> >> Since this was just seen, and the patch below validated as working I
> > J> >wanted
> > J> >> to send
On 1/23/07, Louis Kowolowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:34:48AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 1/22/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 1/22/07, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Jack,
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 02:35:17PM -0800, Jack Vog
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:34:48AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 1/22/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 1/22/07, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Jack,
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 02:35:17PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> >> J> >> Since this was just seen, and the pat
On 1/22/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/22/07, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jack,
>
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 02:35:17PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> J> >> Since this was just seen, and the patch below validated as working I
> J> >wanted
> J> >> to send general email
On 1/22/07, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jack,
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 02:35:17PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
J> >> Since this was just seen, and the patch below validated as working I
J> >wanted
J> >> to send general email to capture this:
J> >>
J> >> The Lenovo X60 can have issues w
Jack,
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 02:35:17PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
J> >> Since this was just seen, and the patch below validated as working I
J> >wanted
J> >> to send general email to capture this:
J> >>
J> >> The Lenovo X60 can have issues with long ping times, this is a KNOWN
J> >> hardware pr
On 1/19/07, Bill Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since this was just seen, and the patch below validated as working I wanted
> to send general email to capture this:
>
> The Lenovo X60 can have issues with long ping times, this is a KNOWN
> hardware problem, and Intel is working with IBM/Lenov
> Since this was just seen, and the patch below validated as working I wanted
> to send general email to capture this:
>
> The Lenovo X60 can have issues with long ping times, this is a KNOWN
> hardware problem, and Intel is working with IBM/Lenovo, a final 'fix' has
> not been decided on yet. Ne
Since this was just seen, and the patch below validated as working I wanted
to send general email to capture this:
The Lenovo X60 can have issues with long ping times, this is a KNOWN
hardware problem, and Intel is working with IBM/Lenovo, a final 'fix' has
not been decided on yet. Nevertheless,
14 matches
Mail list logo