Re: LOR on sleepqueue chain locks, Was: LOR sleepq/scrlock

2008-06-18 Thread John Baldwin
On Friday 09 May 2008 10:53:15 pm Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > > On 23/04/2008, at 3:34 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > > >>> The > >>> real problem at the bottom of the screen though is a real issue. > >>> It's a LOR > >>> of two different sleepqueue chain locks. The problem is that when > >>> setrun

Re: LOR on sleepqueue chain locks, Was: LOR sleepq/scrlock

2008-05-09 Thread Aristedes Maniatis
On 23/04/2008, at 3:34 AM, John Baldwin wrote: The real problem at the bottom of the screen though is a real issue. It's a LOR of two different sleepqueue chain locks. The problem is that when setrunnable() encounters a swapped out thread it tries to wakeup proc0, but if proc0 is asleep (whic

Re: LOR on sleepqueue chain locks, Was: LOR sleepq/scrlock

2008-04-22 Thread John Baldwin
On Saturday 19 April 2008 07:38:27 am Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > > On 19/04/2008, at 3:14 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Thursday 10 April 2008 06:33:40 pm Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > >> > http://www.ish.com.au/s/LOR/1.jpg > http://www.ish.com.au/s/LOR/2.jpg > http://www.ish.com.au

LOR on sleepqueue chain locks, Was: LOR sleepq/scrlock

2008-04-19 Thread Aristedes Maniatis
On 19/04/2008, at 3:14 AM, John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday 10 April 2008 06:33:40 pm Aristedes Maniatis wrote: http://www.ish.com.au/s/LOR/1.jpg http://www.ish.com.au/s/LOR/2.jpg http://www.ish.com.au/s/LOR/3.jpg (this overlaps with [2]) These are all garbage in kuickshow. :( They work fi