If your lag interface is up, what’s not working?
Does something like this work?
ping -D -s 8972
and then this not?
ping -D -s 8972
If your firewall is on the LAN side supporting jumbo frames ok, but not WAN
side, then the router will have to fragment all of the packets. (unless DF bit
i
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 03:59:20PM -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
>
> > On Sep 19, 2016, at 3:08 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> >
> > This is because RTT of this link for jumbo frames higher 1500 bytes
> > frame for store-and-forward switch chain.
>
> For TCP, RTT isn't really a factor (in th
> On Sep 19, 2016, at 3:08 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>
> This is because RTT of this link for jumbo frames higher 1500 bytes
> frame for store-and-forward switch chain.
For TCP, RTT isn't really a factor (in this scenario), as the windowing and
congestion avoidance algorithms will adapt to
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 02:28:56PM -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> > Everything on physical Ethernet has support for it Including the LAN
> > interface of Firewall, and talks to it just fine over a single interface
> > with
> > Jumbo frames enabled.
>
> Well, before you get too carried away,
Everything on physical Ethernet has support for it Including the LAN
interface of Firewall, and talks to it just fine over a single interface with
Jumbo frames enabled.
Well, before you get too carried away, try this:
1) Run a ttcp test between a pair of local hosts using the exiting
jumbofra
On 2016-09-19 3:28 pm, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
This is almost certainly a PMTUd issue.
Unless your end-to-end paths to everything you talk to have
jumboframes configured, there's no benefit to setting them up on the
lagg. Just go with the default MTU.
--lyndon
Everything on physical Ethernet
This is almost certainly a PMTUd issue.
Unless your end-to-end paths to everything you talk to have jumboframes
configured, there's no benefit to setting them up on the lagg. Just go
with the default MTU.
--lyndon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org ma
May not be specific to 11.0-RC3, but since that's what I was running
when trying to set this up I am posting to stable mailing list first.
I was trying to setup an LACP 3 port aggregate connection and having all
kinds of problems, At first I thought it was an issue with NAT
reflection and my f
