2013/3/22 Daniel O'Connor
> Hi,
> I recently updated to KDE 4.9.5 and I've found that unless I disable
> vfs.usermount (which stops gvfs from mounting) everything gets stuck in
> [zfs] eventually.
>
> If you could produce
ps axw
&
mount
Maybe I cou
Hi,
I recently updated to KDE 4.9.5 and I've found that unless I disable
vfs.usermount (which stops gvfs from mounting) everything gets stuck in [zfs]
eventually.
This is running on..
FreeBSD midget.dons.net.au 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #10 r241435M:
Thu Oct 11 15:03:22 CST
On 18/03/2013, at 3:02, Eric S Pulley wrote:
> I have it working fine here. I originally was using it on 9.0 then I
> upgraded everything but that didn't work well for the KDE 4.8->4.9
> update in ports. Too many ports were split and moved around so I ended
> up removing al
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 22:35:02 +1030
"Daniel O'Connor" wrote:
> Hi,
> I am in the process of upgrading all the ports on a 9.1-PRERELEASE
> system and I am having a lot of trouble building or running KDE 4.9.5.
>
> I couldn't build it due to x11/xsd not buildin
Hi,
I am in the process of upgrading all the ports on a 9.1-PRERELEASE system and I
am having a lot of trouble building or running KDE 4.9.5.
I couldn't build it due to x11/xsd not building (didn't make a necessary
header), or if I worked around that libkonq was not found by cmake. I
I have installed FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE amd64 on an Intel DG965WH mainboard
with 6 GB RAM , 500GB Seagate HDD .
When GNOME or KDE is used , their start times are very long as spanning many
minutes , and opening of menus in applications such as Firefox , Dolphin ,
and their other programs are taking
Le Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:25:17 +0200,
Christof Schulze a écrit :
> Hello everyone,
Hi,
> the discussion in -current and the behavior of my hard disk caused me
> to investigate. Whenever kde programs are run on this system, the
> hard disk will not spin down (even when excessive
Hello everyone,
the discussion in -current and the behavior of my hard disk caused me to
investigate. Whenever kde programs are run on this system, the hard disk
will not spin down (even when excessive timeouts for syncs are in effect)
So I ran truss against kwallet and plasma-desktop to find
n the past. On the Clients the users run kde 3.5 or 4.2.
After the update of the server kde 3.5 quit starting up (after logging
in with kdm) on the spalsh screen and comes up with some kind of I/O error
when writing to the home dir. At the same time the server complains about
kernel: NLM: failed
7;exec bash' in my $HOME/.profile and removing this allowed me
>>>>> to run ./Xsession default and push me into KDE !
>>>>>
>>>> KDM though - still refuses to pass to KDE
>>>>
>>> I'm reluctant
On Tuesday, 17. July 2007, Kim Attree wrote:
> Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > On Monday, 16. July 2007, Kim Attree wrote:
> >>> Mike,
> >>>
> >>> I had an 'exec bash' in my $HOME/.profile and removing this allowed me
> >>> to run
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Monday, 16. July 2007, Kim Attree wrote:
>
>>> Mike,
>>>
>>> I had an 'exec bash' in my $HOME/.profile and removing this allowed me
>>> to run ./Xsession default and push me into KDE !
>>>
>
On Monday, 16. July 2007, Kim Attree wrote:
> > Mike,
> >
> > I had an 'exec bash' in my $HOME/.profile and removing this allowed me
> > to run ./Xsession default and push me into KDE !
>
>
> KDM though - still refuses to pass to KDE
I'm
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Michael Nottebrock wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Monday, 9. July 2007, Kim Attree wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>&
t;> On Monday, 9. July 2007, Kim Attree wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I made Root's $HOME point to /var/db (touched to make sure it's
>>>>>> writable on the diskless workstation - it is) and the KDM still
>>>>>&g
(touched to make sure it's
> >>>> writable on the diskless workstation - it is) and the KDM still
> >>>> refuses to pass to Xorg/KDE.
> >>>>
> >>>> Any Other Ideas ???
> >>>
> >>> Make sure you have a hostname s
;s writable
>>>> on the diskless workstation - it is) and the KDM still refuses to pass
>>>> to Xorg/KDE.
>>>>
>>>> Any Other Ideas ???
>>>>
>>> Make sure you have a hostname set (in rc.conf or via dhcp) and
>>>
On Thursday, 12. July 2007, Kim Attree wrote:
> Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > On Monday, 9. July 2007, Kim Attree wrote:
> >> I made Root's $HOME point to /var/db (touched to make sure it's writable
> >> on the diskless workstation - it is) and the KDM s
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Monday, 9. July 2007, Kim Attree wrote:
>
>> I made Root's $HOME point to /var/db (touched to make sure it's writable
>> on the diskless workstation - it is) and the KDM still refuses to pass
>> to Xorg/KDE.
>>
>>
On Monday, 9. July 2007, Kim Attree wrote:
> I made Root's $HOME point to /var/db (touched to make sure it's writable
> on the diskless workstation - it is) and the KDM still refuses to pass
> to Xorg/KDE.
>
> Any Other Ideas ???
Make sure you have a hostname set (in
I made Root's $HOME point to /var/db (touched to make sure it's writable
on the diskless workstation - it is) and the KDM still refuses to pass
to Xorg/KDE.
Any Other Ideas ???
Thanks
Kim Attree
Kim Attree wrote:
> Danny,
>
> thought of that already, /root/.kde is symbolic
Danny,
thought of that already, /root/.kde is symbolically linked to /var/.kde,
which has the contents of /root/.kde and is populated at boot. That
/var/.kde is root writable too...
Thanks
Kim Attree
Danny Braniss wrote:
> don't know if this is the problem, but usualy, in a diskless e
TABLE recently supped and compiled, which is a
> diskless environment. The workstation I'm testing on is working fine,
> Xorg 7.2 is running perfectly as is KDE (I start it up with startx
> from
> a user login).
>
> However, when I run KDM as root, and try to lo
Hey Guys, hoping you can help.
I Have a FREEBSD 6.2-STABLE recently supped and compiled, which is a
diskless environment. The workstation I'm testing on is working fine,
Xorg 7.2 is running perfectly as is KDE (I start it up with startx from
a user login).
However, when I run KDM as root
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 07:50:45PM +0200, Thomas Quinot wrote:
> * Oliver Peter, 2007-04-26 :
>
> > > My problem is the same as Beni's. Splash screen appears and hangs.
> > > I have to press power button to turn off and on my laptop.
> > > Didn't try ctrl+alt+del though.
> >
> > I have the same p
* Oliver Peter, 2007-04-26 :
> > My problem is the same as Beni's. Splash screen appears and hangs.
> > I have to press power button to turn off and on my laptop.
> > Didn't try ctrl+alt+del though.
>
> I have the same problem with my 7.0-CURRENT (yesterday).
> If I can assist you testing or debu
Hey,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 09:43:01AM +0800, Ganbold wrote:
> Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> >On Wednesday, 18. April 2007, Beni wrote:
> >
> >>Hi List,
> >>
> >>I think I have a problem with hal(d) and k3b (version 1.0 from ports) : my
> >>whole system freezes when starting up k3b. I get the spl
Zoran Kolic said the following on 26.04.2007 17:24:
>> Along with update all my system and kernel to 6.2-STABLE on Fri, Apr 6,
>> I have this error message in dmesg output:
>> acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33
>> acd0: FAILURE - INQUIRY ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 sks=0x48 0x00
>> 0x01
>> An
Mark Linimon said the following on 26.04.2007 10:56:
--
> I believe that this problem is now in kern/112119, which I am trying to
> attract developer attention to.
Yes, thanks, Mark.
--
Best regards,
Simon Phoenix (Phoenix Lab.)
---
Ke
> Along with update all my system and kernel to 6.2-STABLE on Fri, Apr 6,
> I have this error message in dmesg output:
> acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33
> acd0: FAILURE - INQUIRY ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 sks=0x48 0x00
> 0x01
> And writing by k3b freeze ALL system, not only k3b.
Beni co
I believe that this problem is now in kern/112119, which I am trying to
attract developer attention to.
mcl
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROT
Beni said the following on 25.04.2007 22:22:
> On Tuesday 24 April 2007 16:49:28 Zoran Kolic wrote:
>>> This problem appear in my system after updating system and ports on
>>> April, 06.
>>> K3b hangs either after loading splash screen or after eject wrote media
>>> from device.
>> Aside that new a
On Tuesday 24 April 2007 16:49:28 Zoran Kolic wrote:
> > This problem appear in my system after updating system and ports on
> > April, 06.
> > K3b hangs either after loading splash screen or after eject wrote media
> > from device.
>
> Aside that new atapi-cam.c is proven to work, I'd like to know
As a data point, I was seeing the same problems, but reverting to
atapi-cam.c rev 1.42.2.2 works here too.
Eric
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL
> This problem appear in my system after updating system and ports on
> April, 06.
> K3b hangs either after loading splash screen or after eject wrote media
> from device.
Aside that new atapi-cam.c is proven to work, I'd like to know if command
line works or not? K3b needs cdrtools in background.
test
> >>>> version of
> >>>> the hal port and do you all have atapicam
> enabled in your kernel? If
> >>>> not,
> >>>> making sure of both might help avoiding the
> problem.
> >>>>
> >>> I see. I know I have updated my system last
> Saturday (14t
fact running the latest
>>>> version of
>>>> the hal port and do you all have atapicam enabled in your kernel? If
>>>> not,
>>>> making sure of both might help avoiding the problem.
>>>>
>>> I see. I know I have updated
d both hal and kdelibs ports. I have atapicam enabled in
kernel.
Let me double check it this weekend and I will let you know.
thanks,
Ganbold
Subject:
Re: Fwd: Re: [kde-freebsd] problem hal - k3b ?
From:
Joe Mar
On Friday 20 April 2007 01:05:17 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> I forwarded my mail to gnome@ (the HAL maintainers) after sending it and
> Joe Marcus Clarke from gnome@ had this to say on the issue:
>
> --- snip
>
> This should have been fixed a while ago by jylefort when he set the
> default device f
check it this weekend and I will let you know.
>
> thanks,
>
> Ganbold
>
> >
> >
> > Subject:
> > Re: Fwd: Re: [kde-freebsd] problem hal - k3b ?
> > From:
> > J
me double check it this weekend and I will let you know.
thanks,
Ganbold
Subject:
Re: Fwd: Re: [kde-freebsd] problem hal - k3b ?
From:
Joe Marcus Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:49:26 -
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Wednesday, 18. April 2007, Beni wrote:
Hi List,
I think I have a problem with hal(d) and k3b (version 1.0 from ports) : my
whole system freezes when starting up k3b. I get the splash screen and then
it all stops and a ctrl-alt-del is the only way out.
My p
BSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
--- Begin Message ---
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> I forgot to cc gnome@ on my reply. I don't think this is a HAL bug, but just
> FYI.
>
>
>
> ----
>
> Subject:
> Re: [kde-free
blem. I built
> and installed a new kernel/world today and can't run k3b as described
> above. I've since reverted to my old kernel and everything's fine again.
> - Rich
I haven't used k3b for a while but I do have problems with kscd,
kaudiocreator, and amarok
On Thursday 19 April 2007 12:12, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Wednesday, 18. April 2007, Beni wrote:
> > Hi List,
> >
> > I think I have a problem with hal(d) and k3b (version 1.0 from ports) :
> > my whole system freezes when starting up k3b. I get the splash screen and
> > then it all stops and
On Wednesday, 18. April 2007, Beni wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I think I have a problem with hal(d) and k3b (version 1.0 from ports) : my
> whole system freezes when starting up k3b. I get the splash screen and then
> it all stops and a ctrl-alt-del is the only way out.
Other people have reported kernel
On Thursday 19 April 2007, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Wednesday, 18. April 2007, Beni wrote:
> Ref:
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2007-April/070753.html
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-April/034486.html
>
> I'm afraid a true kernel hacker will hav
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=109277
The problem looks like a lack of proper locking during the operations with
clist (specifically, this causes multiple entry to cblock_alloc()).
I'm ready to provide further debugging information on
Hello!
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Not that it contradicts anything you said, but it's worth
re-emphasizing that there is apparently no-one in the community
interested in maintaining pppd on FreeBSD, which is how it got to the
current sorry state.
I agree that the absence of pp
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 09:31:47PM +0200, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >Not that it contradicts anything you said, but it's worth
> >re-emphasizing that there is apparently no-one in the community
> >interested in maintaining pppd on FreeBS
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> There's information around PPP that's not been communicated or
> documented well. The 'performance' way to do PPP on FreeBSD is to go off
> and run MPD, because it has the right compromise between doing low-level
> packet shunting in the kernel
On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 03:06 +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
[ snip ]
> All that your "bug report" accomplishes is broadcasting your bad and
> uninformed attitude to an even bigger audience. It is in your own and the
> FreeBSD community's best interest to backtrack before anyone gets to form a
On Sunday, 11. February 2007 02:43, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> So far so good. The problem is that the BSD magicians and the KDE GUI
> magicians are not sharing their spell-books, and thus, their models of
> how the code operates; the communities have to intersect somehow. That
>
off into userland.
MPD is wicked cool, and is a well architected way to do things, but the
ultimate utility depends on how useful it is to everyone who might use it.
So far so good. The problem is that the BSD magicians and the KDE GUI
magicians are not sharing their spell-books, and thus, the
ast. :)
> I agree with you about this not being a KPPP bug (though searching KDE
> bugs for 'kppp' provides no shortage of hits!) and appreciate that KDE
> people have no interest in catering for user ppp, since it's not linux,
> despite or perhaps because of its obviou
Hi,
> On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:24:11 +0100
> Eric Masson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
emss> Right, and an up to date pppd in base would be imho really nice to have.
emss> Kernel pppoe as in Net/Open would be an alternative to net/mpd.
emss> (No, I'm not volunteering to port NetBSD's kernel ppp
and KPPP.
> > >
> > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=i386/98154
> > >
> > > I agree, that sounds similar. I've changed the CC to stable@, since that
> > > is a better place for pppd/kernel ppp related issues.
> > >
>
On Friday, 9. February 2007 22:48, John Walthall wrote:
> Because of known problems with
> PPPD, KPPP should provide at least the option of using user land PPP.
> You may of course differ from this view. However, unless a large outcry
> arises, I will not close the bug. I think that it is, in-fac
ux, (or at least, the
distributions I formerly used) prefer PPPD. Therefore when KDE wrote
KPPP, (and they originally wrote it more-or-less for Linux.) They used
PPPD. There is nothing theoretically invalid about PPPD. It's just not
quite how we do things *most of the time*. Over time FreeB
Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
> Actually, kernel PPP has one significant (at least theoretical)
> advantage over user ppp: Network data is not pushed through the
> kernel/userland interface an additional two times. This is irrelevant
> for low-speed modem interfaces but could be
On 2007-Feb-08 17:16:23 -0500, John Walthall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>functionally obsolete. User PPP provides better service, and several
>tangible design benefits. User PPP is very easy to use, Kernel PPP is not.
Actually, kernel PPP has one significant (at least theoretical)
advantage over u
o implement the
> new and better system. This is not actually an appropriate place for
> this discussion. It should be directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and/or
> http://bugs.kde.org. Because it is a KDE problem and *not* a FreeBSD
> Problem. (I have already submitted it to the KDE Bugzilla
not actually an appropriate place for
this discussion. It should be directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and/or
http://bugs.kde.org. Because it is a KDE problem and *not* a FreeBSD
Problem. (I have already submitted it to the KDE Bugzilla)
These are of course my own opinions.
--
Unless instructed
to stable@, since that
> > is a better place for pppd/kernel ppp related issues.
> >
> > > Is there any intention to address it?
> >
> > I call on the community (especially those with modems) to take it on. To
> > that end, I've left your
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:38:08PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
> Not to suggest that any pppd/kernel interaction problems ought not to be
> addressed by those wishing to maintain pppd for linux compatibility or
> other reasons, but the reality is that most FreeBSD users have long
> preferred user ppp
t;
> I call on the community (especially those with modems) to take it on. To
> that
> end, I've left your motivational speech below intact for everyone's benefit.
Perhaps we should rather be calling upon the KDE developer community to
provide such a frontend interface to confi
and
they're online. That's pretty much the same amount of data input and
interaction that kppp requires.
> I was told on the freebsd-questions
> mailing list that KPPP uses pppd, and that pppd is known to be very buggy
> and essentially unmaintained in FreeBSD. If this is t
Steinberg, Michael wrote:
im compiling kde from the ports for about the hundreth time and something
always goes wrong this time its more simple than most but i can't seem to
find what im looking for. It attempted to fetch a library called tiff.4 in
several places and found nothing. It ask
On Saturday 11 March 2006 21:40, Steinberg, Michael wrote:
> im compiling kde from the ports for about the hundreth time and something
> always goes wrong this time its more simple than most but i can't seem to
> find what im looking for. It attempted to fetch a library called tiff.
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 03:40:57PM -0500, Steinberg, Michael wrote:
> im compiling kde from the ports for about the hundreth time and something
> always goes wrong this time its more simple than most but i can't seem to
> find what im looking for. It attempted to fetch a library ca
im compiling kde from the ports for about the hundreth time and something
always goes wrong this time its more simple than most but i can't seem to
find what im looking for. It attempted to fetch a library called tiff.4 in
several places and found nothing. It asked me to find it and ive
Kris Kennaway schrieb:
> Unfortunately, now we are back to square 1, since you just committed
> KDE 3.5.1 :-)
'S okay - patience is a virtue and package users are the most virtuous
bunch of them all. And as for square one, expat2 got bumped. :O
Cheers,
--
,_, | Michael
ch-up with the official packages,
though by now we had just about got kde 3.5.0 built and uploaded
everywhere. The extensive testing we had to do for recent bsd.port.mk
commits monopolized the build cluster for the past few weeks to the
exclusion of other package builds, and then there were qt and oth
Roger Grosswiler schrieb:
> Hey,
>
> where can i get it from with pkg_add ??
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/packages-using.html
Cheers,
--
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/
Follow the instructions at http://freebsd.kde.org/
On 2/1/06, Roger Grosswiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> where can i get it from with pkg_add ??
>
> thx,
> roger
>
> ___
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/
Hey,
where can i get it from with pkg_add ??
thx,
roger
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Tuesday 31 January 2006 08:25, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > I did have a kernel from before the new malloc and it still seemed quite
> > sluggish. I remember being stuck because a commit to the AGP driver on
> > 20/12/05 prevented the nvidia driver building.
>
> new malloc = userland, not kernel.
Y
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 08:09:16AM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 January 2006 01:16, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > > I did recently update to the latest -current (ie new malloc
> > > implementation) but the the sluggish behaviour was still present prior to
> > > that (although maybe
On Tuesday 31 January 2006 01:16, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > I did recently update to the latest -current (ie new malloc
> > implementation) but the the sluggish behaviour was still present prior to
> > that (although maybe not as bad)
>
> Not to suggest you're imagining things, but someone else
Daniel O'Connor schrieb:
> I just updated to KDE 3.5.0 and it seems considerably more memory hungry that
> 3.4.2, for example..
>
> PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND
> 1126 darius 5 200 213M 50816K kserel 13:09 0.73% amar
I just updated to KDE 3.5.0 and it seems considerably more memory hungry that
3.4.2, for example..
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND
1126 darius 5 200 213M 50816K kserel 13:09 0.73% amarokapp
1119 darius 3 200 260M 67180K
Par Leijonhufvud wrote:
> When I start it up with network up everything is fine, but if the
> network dies (we have a slightly dodgy ADSL, which periodically plays
> yo-yo) it will refuse to open new processes or windows.
>
> Is it (likely to be) a KDE, xopen or freebsd problem
This is on a labtop (IBM Thinkpad R50e) running 5.3-RELEASE.
When I start it up with network up everything is fine, but if the
network dies (we have a slightly dodgy ADSL, which periodically plays
yo-yo) it will refuse to open new processes or windows.
Is it (likely to be) a KDE, xopen or
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 15:48, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > Needless to say that is quite untested/unsupported by us, and if you've
> > been using any packages there's a good chance things aren't fitting
> > together so well. I do hope Xorg 6.8.1 won't break KDE
ckages there's a good chance things aren't fitting
> together so well. I do hope Xorg 6.8.1 won't break KDE on 4.x once it's in
> ports, but I can't discount the possibility.
I built Xorg from source using patches Eric Anholt supplied. Works in 5.x ;)
I guess I&#
On Tuesday, 7. December 2004 00:41, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 00:55, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > On Monday, 6. December 2004 15:03, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > > That didn't work :(
> >
> > What about the icons. Do you have by chance
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 00:55, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Monday, 6. December 2004 15:03, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > That didn't work :(
>
> What about the icons. Do you have by chance downloaded an icontheme from
> kde-look.org via the icon-theme controlpanel and are us
On Monday, 6. December 2004 15:03, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> That didn't work :(
What about the icons. Do you have by chance downloaded an icontheme from
kde-look.org via the icon-theme controlpanel and are using that now?
--
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [EM
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 11:59, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> Hmm, it's pretty big :)
> I just built a list of ports KDE depends on and I'm upgrading them all (big
> hammer approach)
That didn't work :(
Here's the list..
Hermes-1.3.2
ImageMagick-6.0.6.2
ORBit-0.5.17
ORB
ignored (just fyi).
OK, wasn't sure if there was some thread related change recently or so :)
> > Anyone seen this problem and know a fix? :)
>
> I *think* I came across this, but it's too long ago, I can't remember what
> caused it (but I'm quite sure it was no bug i
On Sunday, 5. December 2004 13:06, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Sunday, 5. December 2004 12:07, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I upgraded a machine here to KDE 3.3.1 (as well as Qt and Arts) but now
> > Konqueror is dying :(
> >
> > I initially use
On Sunday, 5. December 2004 12:07, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> Hi,
> I upgraded a machine here to KDE 3.3.1 (as well as Qt and Arts) but now
> Konqueror is dying :(
>
> I initially used packages, but after it didn't work I rebuilt everything
> from the port, but it stil
Hi,
I upgraded a machine here to KDE 3.3.1 (as well as Qt and Arts) but now
Konqueror is dying :(
I initially used packages, but after it didn't work I rebuilt everything
from the port, but it still behaves the same.
If I run konq from a terminal it starts, but if I type anything it blo
On Wed, 2004-Nov-10 09:22:39 -0500, Michael Butler wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>> Maybe you should allow everything on lo0, in and out.
>
>127/8 should always be allowed on the loopback interface,
>127/8 should always be dropped from all other interfaces.
>
>I am "uncom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Maybe you should allow everything on lo0, in and out.
127/8 should always be allowed on the loopback interface,
127/8 should always be dropped from all other interfaces.
I am "uncomfortable" saying that everything should be allowed ..
Michael Butl
* Gunnar Flygt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (20041110 14:48):
> What is it that makes KDE so slow when using pf with these simple rules.
> Have I missed something?
Maybe you should allow everything on lo0, in and out.
--
olive
___
[EMAIL PROTEC
pf.conf, and now KDE is loading quick as
without pf. Is this something that should perhaps be in the example file
for pf? Or are there any security reasons for not having it?
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 02:48:54PM +0100, Gunnar Flygt wrote:
> I've had problems with DKE 3.3 since I upgrade
I've had problems with DKE 3.3 since I upgraded to 5.3-RELEASE.
I compared the same machine (Dell Latitude D600) with a different HD
where Gentoo Linux (Sorry for that:) resides. Om the Gentto box KDE 3.3
starts promply from kdm, no extra delays, but with FreeBSD 5.3 it takes
about 2 minut
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 11:50:44AM -0500, Rick Flosi wrote:
> I used KUser to add a user to my system and after saving the changes I
> made KUser expired all user accounts except the newly created one.
> Does anyone know if there is a patch for KUser to fix this problem. I
> found some discussi
his is the
> way the crashes stopped for me.
> One other thing you could do is use the XFree "nv" driver and not the
> NVidia one.
I am running the nVidia drivers and using KDE with no problems.
[guppy 14:54] ~ >uname -a
FreeBSD guppy.dons.net.au 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURR
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
