>The 'hack' restores general functionality.
the hack brings a buggy behavior back. xbone relied upon
the buggy behavior.
>The current KAME code does not support multiple tunnels between two
>hosts on a single interface. This restores that capability, which is
>required for sett
Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:
>
> >> do you have xbone userland tool in freebsd master repository?
> >> i believed not. xserver is officially supported by freebsd and
> >> userland tools are in the tree. the situation looks different for me.
> >The xbone port has been submitted to the ports
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> is there any reason why the (misnamed, but that's another issue) XBONEHACK
> >> option was eliminated during the recent KAME/FreeBSD-stable merge? (File
> >> /usr/src/sys/net/if_gif.c.) It took us a while to get this added to
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > is there any reason why the (misnamed, but that's another issue) XBONEHACK
> > option was eliminated during the recent KAME/FreeBSD-stable merge? (File
> > /usr/src/sys/net/if_gif.c.) It took us a while to get this added to KAME,
> > and we&#
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there any reason why the (misnamed, but that's another issue) XBONEHACK
> option was eliminated during the recent KAME/FreeBSD-stable merge? (File
> /usr/src/sys/net/if_gif.c.) It took us a while to get this added to KAM
