On 22/2/19 4:12pm, Charlie Li wrote:
I don't think this is beyond the open source community's capabilities at
all; quite the opposite. The real crux is individual priorities.
Right now there is no publicly visible work on porting Java 11 (the only
version worth working on at t
On 21/02/2019 18:00, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> On 21/2/19 9:18pm, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>> Are there plans for the Foundation to sponsor some work in this area?
>> Your point is, that the FreeBSD community should do regular testbuilds
>> for
>>
>> https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/openjdk-jdk9u/
>> ht
this vital work is done. Perhaps ongoing maintenance is easier
once AdoptOpenJDK is brought up to speed on the BSD bits required.
Functioning Java is (IMO) a critical part of a modern server operating
system.
Cheers
Ari
___
freebsd-stable@freebs
On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 04:19, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > With the Java FreeBSD mailing list pretty quiet, I thought I might ask
> > here whether anyone was working on porting the latest Java versions over
> > to FreeBSD.
>
> There's the openjdk port, java
Hi!
> With the Java FreeBSD mailing list pretty quiet, I thought I might ask
> here whether anyone was working on porting the latest Java versions over
> to FreeBSD.
There's the openjdk port, java/openjdk8.
You are asking about input from the FreeBSD community to openj
Hi everyone
With the Java FreeBSD mailing list pretty quiet, I thought I might ask
here whether anyone was working on porting the latest Java versions over
to FreeBSD. There is of coursethe https://adoptopenjdk.net/project, but
there is little activity immediately obvious on porting there [1
> > (r253470 (9.2-BETA1))
> > >
> > > I also upgraded my poudriere building jail. Since then,
> > > multimedia/xbmc port fails to build in configure stage : java
> > > segfaults (sig11). I use WITH_CLANG_IS_CC=YES, for world and
> > > build-jails.
gt; multimedia/xbmc port fails to build in configure stage : java
> > segfaults (sig11). I use WITH_CLANG_IS_CC=YES, for world and
> > build-jails.
> >
> > I found following workarounds:
> > - use previously (with 9.1-RELEASE world and clang) build
> > openjdk
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:51:00AM +0200, Arnaud Houdelette wrote:
> Hi
>
> I recently upgraded my home NAS from 9.1-RELEASE to 9-stable (r253470
> (9.2-BETA1))
>
> I also upgraded my poudriere building jail. Since then, multimedia/xbmc
> port fails to build in c
On 24/07/2013 10:51, Arnaud Houdelette wrote:
Hi
I recently upgraded my home NAS from 9.1-RELEASE to 9-stable (r253470
(9.2-BETA1))
I also upgraded my poudriere building jail. Since then,
multimedia/xbmc port fails to build in configure stage : java
segfaults (sig11).
I use
Hi
I recently upgraded my home NAS from 9.1-RELEASE to 9-stable (r253470
(9.2-BETA1))
I also upgraded my poudriere building jail. Since then, multimedia/xbmc
port fails to build in configure stage : java segfaults (sig11).
I use WITH_CLANG_IS_CC=YES, for world and build-jails.
I found
Dear Stefan,
I'm responding to your inquiry about the Java binaries. I just updated
our website with the current status. We have completed the certification
testing of Java 1.6 on FreeBSD 7. We are now waiting for approval from
Sun. We anticipate it to take another two weeks.
Please l
On Friday 06 June 2008 19:39:59 Stefan Lambrev wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> From http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/
> "We are working on providing Java 1.6 support for FreeBSD 6.3 and 7.0.
> The binaries for 7.0 will be available by June 1."
>
> Any news? :) Where I can r
Greetings,
From http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/
"We are working on providing Java 1.6 support for FreeBSD 6.3 and 7.0.
The binaries for 7.0 will be available by June 1."
Any news? :) Where I can read more?
P.S. I understand that this is not the mailing list to ask, but I can'
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007, Peter Wullinger wrote:
> 2007/11/7, Peter Wullinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > In epistula a David Taylor, die horaque Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 06:18:57PM
> > +:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I've tried compiling j
2007/11/7, Peter Wullinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> In epistula a David Taylor, die horaque Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 06:18:57PM
> +:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've tried compiling java/jdk15 and java/jdk16 bootstrapping with
> > all three binary jdks (diablo
In epistula a David Taylor, die horaque Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 06:18:57PM +:
> Hello,
>
> I've tried compiling java/jdk15 and java/jdk16 bootstrapping with
> all three binary jdks (diablo 1.5, linux 1.5, linux 1.6).
>
> They all give the same problem:
Hello David,
Hello,
I'm having terrible problems getting java working properly on FreeBSD-7.
I've tried java/diablo-jdk15 -- this doesn't work very well at all.
It coredumps running azureus and behaves very oddly running jbidwatcher
(my two current "test applications").
java/linux
On Monday 12 February 2007 01:25 am, Jeffrey Williams wrote:
> Has anyone tried loading the java 1.5 diablo binaries from the freebsd
> foundation on 6.2 yet?
Working fine on my 6.1-RELEASE laptop that was upgraded to 6.2-RELEASE
(without upgrading the JRE package).
--
Freddie Cash
Jeffrey Williams wrote:
> Has anyone tried loading the java 1.5 diablo binaries from the freebsd
> foundation on 6.2 yet?
>
> Thanks
> Jeff
Just reinstalled my workstation at the office at the beginning of the
year with 6.2 and installed the diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01 binary packag
Jeffrey Williams wrote:
Has anyone tried loading the java 1.5 diablo binaries from the freebsd
foundation on 6.2 yet?
Yes. I used diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00 since November to do
some Swing development with SwingWorker, and it worked just fine.
BMS
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 10:55:06AM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Jeffrey Williams wrote:
> >Has anyone tried loading the java 1.5 diablo binaries from the freebsd
> >foundation on 6.2 yet?
> >
> >Thanks
> >Jeff
> >__
On 2/12/07, Jeffrey Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has anyone tried loading the java 1.5 diablo binaries from the freebsd
foundation on 6.2 yet?
Yes, and it works OK. I also happen to run the java/jdk15 port and
it runs just as smoothly. You can ask the port maintainer abo
Jeffrey Williams wrote:
Has anyone tried loading the java 1.5 diablo binaries from the freebsd
foundation on 6.2 yet?
Thanks
Jeff
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe
Has anyone tried loading the java 1.5 diablo binaries from the freebsd
foundation on 6.2 yet?
Thanks
Jeff
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[
I applied the first patch from the folder /usr/ports/java
afterwards I ran "make patch" from /usr/ports/java/jdk14.
Then I went back to /usr/ports/java and applied the other patches.
Compilation fails with:
-I../../../src/share/native/java/util/zip/zlib-1.
1.3 ../../../src/share/native
managed to start without failing. Latest at the 2nd
or 3rd transaction Java coredumps. :(
And as current load testing is done without Apache in between, this
is moot..
/Eirik
Mike
Eirik Øverby wrote:
Update: The diff below was made after making sure both systems
are running the exact
Some apps that use of frequent queries of the system time for example
MySQL are well known in FreeBSD to be slower then Linux because its
more expensive to call compared to Linux, maybe Tomcat is also another
such app this can also be double the case depending on on your jsp and
servlet code.
Clearly they're not 100% equal, but (100-epsilon)%. Your job is to
identify the origin of the epsilon :-)
Yea yea ;) Working on it..
Is there a way to force ACPI-safe on the slower system?
I'm upgrading BIOSes on both boxes now, even though they seem equal.
Then I'll see what ACPI debug ou
On 11/29/05, Eirik Øverby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 29, 2005, at 11:37 , Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:25:07AM +0100, Eirik ?verby wrote:
> >>
> >> On Nov 29, 2005, at 10:15 , Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 09:46:09AM +0100, Eirik Oeverby
On Nov 29, 2005, at 11:37 , Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:25:07AM +0100, Eirik ?verby wrote:
On Nov 29, 2005, at 10:15 , Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 09:46:09AM +0100, Eirik Oeverby wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:48:33AM +0100, Eirik ?verby wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2005, at 10:44 , Joseph Koshy wrote:
>
> >E?> Yea yea ;) Working on it..
> >E?> Is there a way to force ACPI-safe on the slower system?
> >
> ># sysctl kern.timecounter.hardware= >kern.timecounter.choice>
>
> kern.timecoun
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:25:07AM +0100, Eirik ?verby wrote:
>
> On Nov 29, 2005, at 10:15 , Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 09:46:09AM +0100, Eirik Oeverby wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:53:00PM +0100, Eirik
On Nov 29, 2005, at 10:44 , Joseph Koshy wrote:
EØ> Yea yea ;) Working on it..
EØ> Is there a way to force ACPI-safe on the slower system?
# sysctl kern.timecounter.hardware=
kern.timecounter.choice: TSC(-100) ACPI-fast(1000) i8254(0) dummy
(-100)
ACPI-safe is not among the choices. Wh
EØ> Yea yea ;) Working on it..
EØ> Is there a way to force ACPI-safe on the slower system?
# sysctl kern.timecounter.hardware=
--
FreeBSD Volunteer, http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
On Nov 29, 2005, at 10:15 , Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 09:46:09AM +0100, Eirik Oeverby wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:53:00PM +0100, Eirik ?verby wrote:
Firmware versions are equal. BIOS settings are equal.
However, a diff of
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 09:46:09AM +0100, Eirik Oeverby wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:53:00PM +0100, Eirik ?verby wrote:
> >>Firmware versions are equal. BIOS settings are equal.
> >>However, a diff of the dmesgs show (apart from MAC addre
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:53:00PM +0100, Eirik ?verby wrote:
Firmware versions are equal. BIOS settings are equal.
However, a diff of the dmesgs show (apart from MAC address differences):
30c30
< Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz quality
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:53:00PM +0100, Eirik ?verby wrote:
> Firmware versions are equal. BIOS settings are equal.
> However, a diff of the dmesgs show (apart from MAC address differences):
>
> 30c30
> < Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000
> ---
> > Timecounter "ACPI-fast"
On 11/28/05, Eirik Øverby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Update: The diff below was made after making sure both systems are
> running the exact same kernel. Behavior is the same. Building new
> kernels (6-STABLE) now to get out of the BETA stage.
>
> /Eirik
>
> On Nov 28, 2005, at 22:53 , Eirik Øverb
Update: The diff below was made after making sure both systems are
running the exact same kernel. Behavior is the same. Building new
kernels (6-STABLE) now to get out of the BETA stage.
/Eirik
On Nov 28, 2005, at 22:53 , Eirik Øverby wrote:
Firmware versions are equal. BIOS settings are eq
Firmware versions are equal. BIOS settings are equal.
However, a diff of the dmesgs show (apart from MAC address differences):
30c30
< Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000
---
> Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000
What on earth is that all about? The "s
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 09:54:30PM +0100, Eirik ?verby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I have found the culprit. There must be some sort of
> difference between the machines after all (BIOS revision?), because
> while on one machine the interrupt rate for the bge card stays very
> low (2 to be exac
Hi,
I think I have found the culprit. There must be some sort of
difference between the machines after all (BIOS revision?), because
while on one machine the interrupt rate for the bge card stays very
low (2 to be exact) during maximum load, the other machine goes
beyond 1000 and keeps ri
Follow-up:
I've now ran vmstat during load, which confirms the findings of
vmstat during idle time.
Slow system - one sample before and after load start included:
procs memory pagedisks faults cpu
r b w avmfre flt re pi po fr sr da0 pa0 in
On Nov 28, 2005, at 15:54 , Joseph Koshy wrote:
EØ> *loads* more context switches than on the BETA-3 system.
EØ> I have not yet tried this during load
- Which scheduler have you configured (BSD or ULE)?
Running GENERIC/SMP kernels, with BSD scheduler.
Speaking of which; is there a way to ex
On Nov 28, 2005, at 14:45 , Joseph Koshy wrote:
On 11/26/05, Eirik Øverby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
EØ> [Cross-posting after lack of response on -stable]
The first step would be do some performance debugging.
Yep.
- What do top/vmstat/systat say about what the OS and
apps are doing? I
On 11/26/05, Eirik Øverby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
EØ> [Cross-posting after lack of response on -stable]
The first step would be do some performance debugging.
- What do top/vmstat/systat say about what the OS and
apps are doing? Is the CPU pegged at 100%? What's
the load seen by the d
Hi all,
are there any obvious changes between 6.0-BETA3 and 6.0-RELEASE / 6.0-
STABLE that I should be aware of, that could cause a quite noticeable
decline in performance (and a change in performance patterns) for
java/tomcat?
On a BETA-3 system I'm seeing, with the parti
Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 07:04:19PM +0100
alex bustamante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > alex bustamante wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I need to serve .jsp's with jakarta. Read somewhere that compiling the
> >> jdk
> >> and getting it to work with jakarta isn't the eaysiest thing to do. Is
> >> Linux p
* alex bustamante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [1206 18:06]:
>
> > alex bustamante wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I need to serve .jsp's with jakarta. Read somewhere that compiling the
> >> jdk
> >> and getting it to work with jakarta isn't the eaysiest thing to do. Is
> >> Linux prefered for this task, or will
> alex bustamante wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I need to serve .jsp's with jakarta. Read somewhere that compiling the
>> jdk
>> and getting it to work with jakarta isn't the eaysiest thing to do. Is
>> Linux prefered for this task, or will i do better with FreeBSD?
>> Thanks.
>>
>
> We regularly compile Ja
BSD?
>> Thanks.
>>
>
> We regularly compile Jakarta/Tomcat from ports without any issues.
> --
> Matt
Both Linux and FreeBSD are quite able to run Jakarta.
Besides the need to make linux java prior to making native FreeBSD java, there
is
little difference between running Jakarta
le Jakarta/Tomcat from ports without any issues.
I think the difficulty comes primarily from compiling Java. You need
to manually fetch a couple of pieces and go through the Sun registration
dance. But after that, it's pretty smooth.
Scott
___
[
alex bustamante wrote:
Hi,
I need to serve .jsp's with jakarta. Read somewhere that compiling the jdk
and getting it to work with jakarta isn't the eaysiest thing to do. Is
Linux prefered for this task, or will i do better with FreeBSD?
Thanks.
We regularly compile Jakarta/Tomcat from ports without
Hi,
I need to serve .jsp's with jakarta. Read somewhere that compiling the jdk
and getting it to work with jakarta isn't the eaysiest thing to do. Is
Linux prefered for this task, or will i do better with FreeBSD?
Thanks.
--
alex bustamante - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
I'm using linux-mozilla with the libjavaoji plugin in
/usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.3.1.
Anytime that a java applet is loaded, my browser comes to a screeching
halt and java_vm just chews up my CPU.
I believe that this problem has existed since 4.6. Does anyone know
what I can do to fix it?
T
hi,
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 11:52:01AM -0700, Shannon -jj Behrens wrote:
> > DWC> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 11:35:41AM -0600, Jason Porter wrote:
> > >> glibc-2.1.2-11. It finally exists with an Error code 1 and stops the
> > >> install. Anyone else have this problem?
> >
> > DWC> This happens
t; >
> > > Of course, I've set the appropriate symlink in /usr/X11R6/lib/mozilla/plugins/.
> > >
> > > Java is working now in Mozilla, but *not* in Galeon. Anybody knows how to get
> > > it running in Galeon?
> >
> > Make sure "Enable Java&
ink in /usr/X11R6/lib/mozilla/plugins/.
> >
> > Java is working now in Mozilla, but *not* in Galeon. Anybody knows how to get
> > it running in Galeon?
>
> Make sure "Enable Java" is checked under Settings.
"Allow Java" is of course set.
Gerhard
--
mail: gerh
On Sun, 2002-03-17 at 23:24, Gerhard Häring wrote:
> Ok, so now I've built $latest of Galeon, Mozilla and the native FreeBSD JDK.
>
> Of course, I've set the appropriate symlink in /usr/X11R6/lib/mozilla/plugins/.
>
> Java is working now in Mozilla, but *not* in Galeon.
Ok, so now I've built $latest of Galeon, Mozilla and the native FreeBSD JDK.
Of course, I've set the appropriate symlink in /usr/X11R6/lib/mozilla/plugins/.
Java is working now in Mozilla, but *not* in Galeon. Anybody knows how to get
it running in Galeon?
Gerhard
--
mail: gerhar
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> Andrew Reilly wrote:
>
>> I'm a little disappointed that it didn't actually solve the
>> problem that I wanted solved: Java in a native web browser. I
>> had hoped that the build process for either mozilla or galeon
>> wou
egards,
Oliver Schonefeld
P.S. anyways ... great job porting java. keep up the good work :)
--
And remember: "To Infinity And Far Beyond ... Somehow?!"
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 06:29:22PM +0100, Alex wrote:
> Is there away to install JDK 1.3+ without X?
Not from the port. It needs to be built on a machine with X, but once
you've done that you can create a package and move it to other machines
you have without X. The SCSL doesn't stop you doing
Hello Andrew,
Tuesday, February 12, 2002, 5:54:15 AM, you wrote:
AR> On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 02:28:34PM +0100, Gunnar Flygt wrote:
>> What's the status for Java native version for FreeBSD, that was
>> announced in stable a few weeks ago?
AR> I've just installed th
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 02:28:34PM +0100, Gunnar Flygt wrote:
> What's the status for Java native version for FreeBSD, that was
> announced in stable a few weeks ago?
I've just installed the native j2ee_sdk that lives in
/usr/ports/java/jdk13, seemingly without problems. I had t
Hello, Sam Drinkard!
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 10:20:15PM -0500, you wrote:
> I just discovered I need to install java on this machine, but looking at
> the ports, I see all kinds of flavors of java. Is the Linux-jdk 13/14
> fairly stable? Stated in the docs of the software I'm at
Dear All,
>
> BTW, I think it's "included with the release", not "part of the base."
> Slight difference there; Java is not going to be part of the core of
> FreeBSD, at least not until Sun BSDLs it. :)
>
Java will be available as a port and maybe
I'd ask over on the freebsd-java list, they'll have a better idea
what's going on.
BTW, I think it's "included with the release", not "part of the base."
Slight difference there; Java is not going to be part of the core of
FreeBSD, at least not until Sun
According to information at http://www.freebsd.org/java, the JDK and JRE are
going to be a part of the base release in v. 4.5. I'm tracking the release
candidates and can't find it. Is it in there, or has that change been
pushed off until a bit later?
Thanks for the info,
- Troy C
Chris Byrnes wrote:
>
> Apologize, in advance, for the very blatant mis-use of cross-posting.
>
> I have a client who is demanding I run java 1.3 compatability, but all
> versions of kaffee and jdk that I can find are only supporting 1.1 -- Does
> anyone know of anything?
&
> "reverend" == The Reverend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
reverend> I have actually used this on large applications and I've
reverend> received absolutely no errors...
You're lucky... ;-)
reverend> Are you getting the "cannot uninstall alt signal stack error"?
No. Only errors about threads
>>>>> "Will" == Will Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Will> Uh, it's right in ports/java/linux-jdk13.
This port doesn't work well enough to use it in production... Have you
tried it with some big code (Forte, for example) ? See the crashes (or
free
Mike Hoskins wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Excuse this if it's off-topic... I couldn't think of the best place to
> ask this, and I am running STABLE on all production machines, so...
>
> We have a lot of proprietary code written in Java running on Wintel
> boxes.
Hello,
Excuse this if it's off-topic... I couldn't think of the best place to
ask this, and I am running STABLE on all production machines, so...
We have a lot of proprietary code written in Java running on Wintel
boxes. There's been talk of migrating to Linux, and our ini
> In dealing with the Netscape issue, I was reminded of the latest Java
> implementation on v1.3 of the JDK/JRE. Has there been effort to
> add Java JDK/JRE v1.3 to -current or possible -STABLE?!?
Because Java is not open-source, it will never become a default part of
the FreeBS
77 matches
Mail list logo
