On Sunday, 8 July 2001 at 20:47:53 -0500, Dave Uhring wrote:
> On Sunday 08 July 2001 19:32, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
>
>>
>> This "virus-like" aspect of the GPL is also very loudly explained in
>> a 12-page presentation distributed internally to all developers at
>> IBM. (The virus-like aspect i
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 10:02:27AM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> >
> > So why don't we get a FreeBSD port of XFS done "real soon now", see what
> > kind of kernel mods we have to make, and talk nice to the SGI folks? If
> > they're running into brick walls at every turn on the Linux path, wh
On Saturday, 7 July 2001 at 14:50:21 +0200, A. L. Meyers wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Greg Lehey wrote:
>
>> On Friday, 6 July 2001 at 11:31:49 +0100, Antony T Curtis wrote:
>>> Greg Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 July 2001 at 11:38:08 +0100, Antony T Curtis wrote:
> Greg Lehey wrot
> Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 14:50:21 +0200 (CEST)
> From: "A. L. Meyers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> As far as I know, ReiserFS is GPL. What would porting it to
> FreeBSD be better or worse than other (newer and less stable)
> alternatives?
>
> Is this a technical issue or are politics involved?
AFAIK R
On Wednesday, 4 July 2001 at 11:38:08 +0100, Antony T Curtis wrote:
> Greg Lehey wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday, 12 June 2001 at 19:22:45 +0200, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
>>> On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:09:58 +0100
>>> Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 08:32:23AM -0
