Re: Interrupt storm with shared interrupt on digi(4)

2008-06-05 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080605 07:58] wrote: > On Thursday 05 June 2008 02:19:31 am Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > * John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080604 11:12] wrote: > > > On Tuesday 03 June 2008 03:04:18 pm Peter Jeremy wrote: > > > > BTW, your MUA's list-reply configuration don't r

Re: Interrupt storm with shared interrupt on digi(4)

2008-06-05 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday 05 June 2008 02:19:31 am Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080604 11:12] wrote: > > On Tuesday 03 June 2008 03:04:18 pm Peter Jeremy wrote: > > > BTW, your MUA's list-reply configuration don't recognize that > > > freebsd-stable@ and stable@ are aliases. > >

Re: Interrupt storm with shared interrupt on digi(4)

2008-06-04 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080604 11:12] wrote: > On Tuesday 03 June 2008 03:04:18 pm Peter Jeremy wrote: > > BTW, your MUA's list-reply configuration don't recognize that > > freebsd-stable@ and stable@ are aliases. > > Yes, kmail is broken and the authors refuse to fix it. It happens o

Re: Interrupt storm with shared interrupt on digi(4)

2008-06-04 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday 03 June 2008 03:04:18 pm Peter Jeremy wrote: > BTW, your MUA's list-reply configuration don't recognize that > freebsd-stable@ and stable@ are aliases. Yes, kmail is broken and the authors refuse to fix it. It happens on reply to a foo@ e-mail (it changes the 'To' to 'freebsd-foo@' be

Re: Interrupt storm with shared interrupt on digi(4)

2008-06-03 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2008-Jun-03 10:21:35 -0400, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> In the past, I have managed to avoid the problem by putting the Digi >> card on a dedicated interrupt. For reasons I don't understand, this >> appears to mask the problem. > >That is because we leave interrupts masked until

Re: Interrupt storm with shared interrupt on digi(4)

2008-06-03 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday 03 June 2008 03:08:40 am Peter Jeremy wrote: > I have an on-going problem with DigiBoard Xem boards causing interrupt > storms (since 4.x days). The FreeBSD driver polls the board and > doesn't have a functional interrupt handler (and Linux behaves in the > same way). It seems that und

Interrupt storm with shared interrupt on digi(4)

2008-06-03 Thread Peter Jeremy
I have an on-going problem with DigiBoard Xem boards causing interrupt storms (since 4.x days). The FreeBSD driver polls the board and doesn't have a functional interrupt handler (and Linux behaves in the same way). It seems that under some conditions, the board will assert its interrupt line and