Hi,
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:28:40 +1000
> Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Mark_Andrews> I can't see how that can have any effect as the shift
Mark_Andrews> is only 0..15 (0xf).
Mark_Andrews> filter[h >> 4] |= 1 << (h & 0xF);
Yup, you are right. I focused attention
> Could you try this patch? Since I don't have SMC 83c170 card, I
> cannot test it by myself.
>
> Index: sys/dev/tx/if_tx.c
> diff -u -p sys/dev/tx/if_tx.c.orig sys/dev/tx/if_tx.c
> --- sys/dev/tx/if_tx.c.orig Tue Oct 29 10:43:49 2002
> +++ sys/dev/tx/if_tx.cThu Aug 11 17:47:45 2005
>
Hi,
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:55:23 +1000
> Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Mark_Andrews> I have a problem in that the router solicitations are not
Mark_Andrews> being received by my FreeBSD IPv6 router unless I enable
Mark_Andrews> promiscuous mode on the tx0 interface. This
Mark,
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Mark Andrews wrote:
> I have a problem in that the router solicitations are not
> being received by my FreeBSD IPv6 router unless I enable
> promiscuous mode on the tx0 interface. This causes delays
> to autoconf for other IPv6 boxes on the net
I have a problem in that the router solicitations are not
being received by my FreeBSD IPv6 router unless I enable
promiscuous mode on the tx0 interface. This causes delays
to autoconf for other IPv6 boxes on the net until the
periodic router announcement i