Re: Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-12 Thread H
David Thiel wrote: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:53:59AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> PR ? > The original thread was here: > > http://marc.info/?t=13250246001&r=1&w=2 > > Ignore the part where it takes me a while to figure out fsck isn't > softupdate-aware. > > There was further followup off-l

Re: Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-09 Thread Adrian Chadd
You didn't answer my question - is there a PR opened for this? Adrian On 9 March 2012 12:02, David Thiel wrote: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:53:59AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> PR ? > > The original thread was here: > > http://marc.info/?t=13250246001&r=1&w=2 > > Ignore the part where it

Re: Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-09 Thread David Thiel
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:53:59AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > PR ? The original thread was here: http://marc.info/?t=13250246001&r=1&w=2 Ignore the part where it takes me a while to figure out fsck isn't softupdate-aware. There was further followup off-list with the associated SUJ develo

Re: Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-09 Thread Adrian Chadd
PR ? Adrian On 8 March 2012 11:07, David Thiel wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 05:12:16PM -0500, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >> I've been running a couple of system with 9.0-RELEASE since it is out. >> All the system were installed through the standard installation >> procedure. After unclean reboot

Re: Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-08 Thread David Thiel
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 05:12:16PM -0500, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > I've been running a couple of system with 9.0-RELEASE since it is out. > All the system were installed through the standard installation > procedure. After unclean reboot, either crash or power-failure, I get > a huge amount of reall

Re: Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-06 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Thierry Thomas wrote: > Le mar 6 mar 12 à 10:41:16 +0100, Julian H. Stacey > écrivait : > > > A German magazine (CT) reported on placebo cache chips some > > years back, chips with pins but no silicon inside. > > This one is original, at least: >

Re: Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-06 Thread Thierry Thomas
Le mar 6 mar 12 à 10:41:16 +0100, Julian H. Stacey écrivait : > A German magazine (CT) reported on placebo cache chips some > years back, chips with pins but no silicon inside. This one is original, at least:

Re: Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-06 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Xin Li wrote: > On 03/05/12 14:12, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been running a couple of system with 9.0-RELEASE since it is > > out. All the system were installed through the standard > > installation procedure. After unclean reboot, either crash or > > power-failure, I get a huge a

Re: Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-05 Thread Mark Saad
On Mar 5, 2012, at 5:21 PM, Xin Li wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 03/05/12 14:12, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've been running a couple of system with 9.0-RELEASE since it is >> out. All the system were installed through the standard >> installation p

Re: Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-05 Thread Xin Li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/05/12 14:12, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > I've been running a couple of system with 9.0-RELEASE since it is > out. All the system were installed through the standard > installation procedure. After unclean reboot, either crash or > power-fa

Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-05 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, I've been running a couple of system with 9.0-RELEASE since it is out. All the system were installed through the standard installation procedure. After unclean reboot, either crash or power-failure, I get a huge amount of really bad filesystem corruption (read: "silent", fs-wide, corruptions).